Pfizer-Allergan to throw down tax-reform gauntlet

November 23, 2015

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Pfizer’s hookup with Allergan will be a smack in the face for politicians on both sides of the American political aisle. The drug firms are shrugging off Uncle Sam’s latest attempt to prevent companies from pursuing mergers predicated on relocating to low-tax jurisdictions. The largest-ever deal of its kind, at some $150 billion, ought to raise pressure on lawmakers like the new Republican House Speaker, Paul Ryan, to craft more comprehensive fixes to the great M&A tax dodge.

A slew of similar deals, dubbed “inversions,” resulted in companies – particularly healthcare groups like Mylan and Medtronic – saving chunky amounts on their tax liabilities. By lowering the amount of profit it pays to the taxman to around 15 percent, Pfizer could add some $2.1 billion to the bottom line in 2017, according to analyst earnings estimates.

Treasury boss Jack Lew has attempted to make it harder for corporations to shift their tax domiciles, and more difficult to avoid taxes on existing assets once they have done so. Reforms announced last year eliminated loopholes such as “hop-scotch” loans under which deferred foreign earnings were routed through a new non-U.S. parent to avoid taxes. Last week, the Treasury fine-tuned its rules on inversion deals by making it harder to reduce taxes by stuffing assets into new companies overseas.

But, as Pfizer boss Ian Read will attempt to demonstrate with Allergan, it’s still relatively easy to get around these rules. There’s little that can be done when an overseas company purchases an American company, for instance. So by structuring the transaction as a purchase of Pfizer by Allergan – even though Pfizer’s shareholders may still own a majority of the combination – the new company might be able to call itself Irish for tax purposes.

The problem is that U.S. companies must pay taxes on income that is earned overseas and brought home. If the cash is repatriated, the company owes the difference between the rate paid overseas and the higher U.S. rate. The result is lots of profits stashed away overseas, and clever accountants and lawyers figuring out ingenious ways to skirt the rules.

Resolving this will require Congressional action – such as by lowering the marginal rate paid by companies or limiting taxation to income earned domestically. House Speaker Ryan needn’t wait for his party to get its act together on the presidential campaign front before proposing a fix that not only prevents future Pfizers from fleeing, but lures them back to American shores.

 

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/