GE making wicked smaht HQ move to Boston

By Rob Cox
January 13, 2016

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Despite hosting the tea party that kicked off America’s revolution against British rule, Boston hasn’t easily shaken the unwelcome distinction as the capital of a state derided as Taxachusetts. That didn’t deter General Electric, the industrial behemoth adept at minimizing its tax liabilities, from moving there. Beantown ticks many boxes for a company whose motto is “Imagination at Work.”

While it was dunderheaded tax policy in GE’s home state of Connecticut that triggered Chief Executive Jeff Immelt and his board to consider relocating, the choice announced on Wednesday suggests that more than just the bottom line informed the decision.

Money matters, of course. GE will receive some $20 million in property-tax relief over two decades, according to the Boston Globe. And the Commonwealth of Massachusetts may kick in some $120 million more. That’s a lot of inducement for a headquarters that will house about 800 employees. Other cities probably proffered similar goodies, meaning the final decision sends a strong signal about both Boston and GE.

The nearly $300 billion company is undergoing a wrenching process of exiting the financial-services trap that nearly buckled it seven years ago. It’s refocusing on making things that power the world, move people, purify water, connect cities and, for now at least, fit kitchens.

Boston is home to some 250,000 students at more than 55 colleges and universities, including world-class research hubs like Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University. In that sense, GE is hitching its brand to the innovation that emanates from their labs and classrooms, and eventually supplies it more new recruits.

By packing up from a sleepy Connecticut suburb the company is also tapping into an urbanization trend taking root with younger Americans, enabling it to attract engineers and executives who might be considering jobs in New York City and San Francisco.

What’s more, Logan International Airport is just a 12-minute ride from the city center, and Boston boasts a decent transportation system. Despite the cost overruns of the “Big Dig” a few years ago, its traffic mostly flows. The only obvious drawback to GE’s choice is that the top brass may need to leave their New York Yankees caps behind.

2 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

A wake up call for Connecticut — and the US.

There are countries around our connected world who give dramatic corporate tax benefits to our highest on the planet. Medical Device firms face even more draconian reasons to leave our shores — a 2.3% tax on total revenues is the equivalent of more than 10% additional tax on top of the current taxes that are driving our best and brightest headquarters to Ireland, et. al.

But divisive politics will make sure both the states and the country will chase votes by chasing companies away. Hey Pizza parlors — where do you think your customers get the dollars to buy your circular delights? Keep voting in these taxing idiots and you will lose your business.

Posted by TomMariner | Report as abusive

Smaght? Spell-checkers getting expensive? Or are you trying to assert some Hibernian connexion?

Posted by Farrell-Vinay | Report as abusive