Murdoch’s second season could be good for Sky

January 29, 2016

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.

Four years after resigning at the height of a phone-hacking scandal, James Murdoch is back as chairman of Sky. Second seasons often can be disappointing, but Murdoch’s comeback may be good for the UK satellite broadcaster.

Sky’s board doesn’t appear to have made an exhaustive search to replace Nicholas Ferguson. The move might rattle investors, particularly since Sky seemed to distance itself from the Murdoch clan in the wake of the phone-hacking scandal at the now-closed News of the World. But it’s a far different situation than in 2003, when James overcame loud cries of nepotism as he became Sky’s chief executive at the age of 30. In the years that followed, including a first stint as chairman, he managed to win over investors. This time his 11-strong board will have six independent directors, with Martin Gilbert of Aberdeen Asset Management moving up to be deputy chairman. Murdoch, who was already a director, leaves an empty seat that should arguably be filled by an outsider.

Murdoch’s appointment probably doesn’t signal a shift in Sky’s strategy. The company had its strongest customer growth in 10 years in the UK and Ireland in the three months ended Dec. 31. The big question is whether 39 percent shareholder Twenty-First Century Fox might make another bid for Sky after its predecessor, News Corp, made and then dropped a takeover approach in 2011. Murdoch, who is also chief executive of Fox, has in the past said owning the minority of an unconsolidated asset “is not an end state that is natural for us”.

Yet if that’s the goal, Murdoch’s appointment would only complicate things. It makes little sense to fuel speculation that could make Sky’s shares, up more than 2 percent in morning trading on Jan. 29, more expensive. Conversely, it probably signals that Fox isn’t planning on selling soon, either. And that Murdoch’s rehabilitation from the phone-hacking scandal is largely complete.

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

In his article of the Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree  /2016/jan/29/rupert-murdoch-morality-ph one-hacking-leveson
asks M.Preston: “How could any organisation survive the sordid revelations that emerged at the Leveson inquiry, costing the Murdoch empire millions in compensation and legal fees, along with the closure of a flagship title?”
Not only the tycoon’s empire survive but he is asking at present for a revenge. It is a pity that the available means fox and sky get in hands are not analysed to estimate the new challenges put before them by the BBC, netflix, and by the huge corruption in sports.

Posted by meleze | Report as abusive