Republicans find Hillary easier mark than economy

By Rob Cox
July 20, 2016

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

The Republican National Convention’s “Make America Work Again” day was devoted almost entirely to keeping one woman – Hillary Clinton – from getting a job. Though voters may prefer Donald Trump on economic matters, the paucity of detailed discussion of how to recharge growth and generally ameliorate the American condition, as he promises, suggests the presumptive GOP nominee is struggling on substance.

Since kicking off their confab in Cleveland on Monday, Republicans have barraged the party faithful with vitriol over Clinton’s personal-email fiasco, the ransacking of a diplomatic outpost in Libya during her time as secretary of state and a general lack of trustworthiness in her and her husband, Bill, the former president. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie conducted a mock prosecutorial takedown of Clinton during his headliner address on Tuesday.

Delegates chanted “lock her up” and “Hillary for Prison” T-shirts are widely available for sale in downtown Cleveland. In an analysis of Tuesday’s speeches, statistician Nate Silver totted up 157 mentions of “Hillary” and “Clinton” and just 37 uses of the word “work.”

This isn’t surprising given how much more difficult a target the economy makes. GDP growth isn’t particularly robust, at around 2 percent. And there are plenty of important asterisks attached to the country’s 4.9 percent unemployment rate: Sluggish wage growth, workers moving to less-lucrative service jobs and millions giving up looking for work. Compared to Europe, Japan and parts of the emerging world, however, America is in ruddy health.

Convention host Ohio provides a case in point. The Buckeye State’s jobless rate has hovered around 5 percent this year, compared to 11 percent in late 2009. Indeed, it was one of Republican Governor John Kasich’s selling points in his unsuccessful presidential campaign. Tellingly, Kasich is not scheduled to appear at the convention.

Economic cheerleaders for Trump are sparse on the event schedule and in the halls of the Quicken Loans arena. At a Politico event, two of his top advisers suggested they were working on a plan to boost growth by 4 percent, but conceded it’s a work in a progress. The economy is “finally what folks in the campaign are looking at,” economist Larry Kudlow said when pressed on the absence of a detailed plan. That’s good because they haven’t found much so far.

(Gina Chon also contributed to this column.)

2 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Trump’s economic plan is available online, Mr. Cox. Do some research.

The RNC convention, like the DNC convention, next week will be, is designed to fire up the base. Not make outside (opposing party) observers feel warm and fuzzy.

The one point you do make well is that economic growth is currently very poor. Hillary proposes to stay the course. What kind of leader opts to stay with a failed economic plan?

Posted by WayneVan | Report as abusive

It’s time for some OUT-OF-THE-BOX thinking. The “establishment” of both parties is mired in group thinking of tax and spend without ever really analyzing any problem or the unintended consequences of legislation. They are also out of touch with the average American, concentrating instead on the bitching of every social special interest group. There has been almost no real private sector job creation in eight years.
With a trillion dollars of profits sitting offshore, these politicians want to collect taxes at the current rates which are second only to socialistic France. How about reducing the rate significantly with the caveat that the money be spent IN THE UNITED STATES on plant, equipment and training?
Globalization, except in terms of trade, is an elitist politician’s utopian dream. Brexit proved that the average Brit isn’t willing to give up his national pride to an umbrella government that wants to do away with national borders. We need change and not the disastrous ones of the past eight years.

Posted by Pilgrim1620 | Report as abusive