North Sea blowout hardly justifies Total meltdown
By Kevin Allison
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
Two years after BP’s deep sea Gulf of Mexico disaster, Total is facing an underwater emergency of its own. The French oil major said on March 27 that it could take up to six months to stem the flow of gas from a leaking well off the Scottish coast. That sent shivers down the spines of investors who watched BP lose about half its market value as the Deepwater Horizon disaster turned from bad, to worse, to catastrophic.
Dodger blue outshines gold after $2 bln deal
By Christopher Swann and Martin Hutchinson
The authors are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.
The $2 billion deal for the Los Angeles Dodgers is a home run for sports owners everywhere. The near five-fold rise in the value of the West Coast baseball team since it last changed hands in 2004 underlines a surge in the value of top sports franchises. Only gold comes close to keeping pace as an investment. Rising television revenue is bringing in more cash. But it’s the swelling ranks of the ultra-rich in search of trophy investments that’s stoking prices.
These new owners usually stem from the ranks of high finance. Last year, Apollo co-founder Joshua Harris bought basketball’s 76ers in Philadelphia while Tom Gores and his buyout firm Platinum Equity snapped up the Detroit Pistons. And only last month, hedge fund manager Steven Cohen bought a 4 percent slug of the Mets.
Pricey exploration means dear oil is here to stay
By Christopher Swann and Kevin Allison
The authors are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.
Gas guzzlers may wait in vain for a return to cheap oil. Big producing nations like Saudi Arabia, which handed out cash to restive citizens during last year’s Arab Spring, need higher oil prices to balance their books. Meanwhile, a three-fold increase in the costs associated with extracting crude over the past decade has made expensive oil more a necessity than a luxury for energy firms, according to a Morningstar study. Put the two trends together and it looks like dear oil is here to stay.
Monopolies thrive when politicians go short-term
By Rob Cox
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist and a Northeast Utilities customer. The opinions expressed are his own.
If there ever was a deal that elected officials should hate it’s the $17.5 billion proposal to create an electricity monopoly in New England. Last year Northeast Utilities, which wants to buy NSTAR of Massachusetts, proved to be a uniquely incompetent serial abuser of its dominant position. And yet authorities are now poised to give the merger the green light. The lesson: short-term political thinking benefits monopolies.
Hurricane Irene last August and a freak October snowstorm each left millions of Northeast’s captive customers in Connecticut without power for days while nearby rivals performed far better. An independent report painted Northeast as a hapless, unaccountable monopoly. But the power of money today speaks more loudly to politicians than the promise of greater competency tomorrow. Connecticut and Massachusetts have extracted pounds of flesh that offer significant political benefits to the two states’ governors in the short term. But they do little to ensure the new behemoth is held to higher standards of service or accountability.
Wall Street can relate to Hollywood underdog tale
By Jeffrey Goldfarb
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
The dystopian kill-or-be-killed world of “The Hunger Games” isn’t the film’s only apt metaphor for Wall Street. This weekend’s smash box-office debut of the teen lit sensation makes Lions Gate the studio equivalent of a boutique investment bank landing the year’s biggest deal. And Walt Disney’s coinciding flop “John Carter” raises questions about Hollywood’s bulge bracket. Independents from both industries are fighting to stay in the spotlight.
Lions Gate is deservedly the talk of the town. In the first few days of its release, “The Hunger Games” delivered $155 million of U.S. and Canadian ticket sales. That makes it the biggest non-sequel opener ever, and leaves it third behind only later chapters in the “Harry Potter” and “Batman” series. It’s a coup for a relative tiddler, especially when a goliath rival announces a $200 million loss on an epic fail even by Tinseltown’s larger-than-life standards, as Disney just did for its own fantastical book adaptation.
What’s more, in a banker’s terms, “The Hunger Games” is like having an acquisition-hungry client with an abundance of capital available. Lions Gate plans to release three sequels based on the Suzanne Collins trilogy of bestsellers, so it’s a gift that should keep on giving.
But competing against rivals owned by deep-pocketed conglomerates is as hard on the West Coast as it is on the East. Even with the lucre raked in so far from “The Hunger Games,” Lions Gate won’t crack the top five in the studio league tables, according to Box Office Mojo figures. Legendary moguls Harvey and Bob Weinstein have struggled similarly, producing a steady slate of critical successes via their eponymous indie house – including this year’s Oscar winner “The Artist” – that often fail to achieve blockbuster status financially.
Smaller shops on Wall Street have capitalized on the misfortunes of their larger peers. Greenhill, for example, is valued at over 16 times expected 2013 earnings, according to Thomson Reuters data. And despite losing money over the last few years, Lions Gate trades at a forward multiple of 15.
After spurning the advances of activist Carl Icahn last year at about half the current share price, Lions Gate spent over $400 million to buy “Twilight” producer Summit. That gives it the ability to release more films, on a par with the likes of Paramount. That’s important in a business that feeds on big hits. Just as banking supermarkets can no longer ignore the boutiques nipping at their heels, “The Hunger Games” means Hollywood must pay heed to the Lions Gate mouse that roared.
Botched BATS IPO at least good test of markets
By Antoy Currie
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
The botched BATS initial public offering could be disastrous for the upstart electronic exchange. It scrapped its market debut on Friday after shares crashed from their $16 opening to just 2 cents after a “serious technical failure.” It’s a potential killer for the company, which is already the focus of investigations into high-frequency trading. The good news is that the stumble didn’t catalyze a broader market meltdown.
That at least offers some reassurance that the infrastructure of U.S. equity markets is far more robust than it was at the time of the so-called Flash Crash of May 2010. Markets tanked 9 percent in seconds then, after a few random trades kicked off a tailspin across the many electronic trading platforms and exchanges handling U.S stocks.
BT gets better side of deal with its pension fund
By Chris Hughes
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
BT is finally regaining the initiative in the battle over its gargantuan pension deficit. The UK telecoms group has reported a sharply reduced shortfall in the scheme’s funding position, and cut a favourable deal with members to close the remaining gap. It’s not hard to see why BT shares gained 6 percent, adding 1 billion pounds to the group’s market value. But it would be wrong to assume that the pension deficit is now a dead issue.
Jaguar far from becoming China’s next top model
By John Foley
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
Jaguar Land Rover wants to be China’s luxury brand of choice, but it is taking a circuitous route. The high-class car maker, owned by India’s Tata Motor, has announced a joint venture with China’s Chery Auto, a state-owned producer known for being cheap and cheerful. As a strategy for snagging a bigger share of China’s giant auto market, this is risky.
What’s Facebook really worth?
By Richard Beales
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
Facebook’s 31 underwriting banks are mobilizing for the company’s initial public offering. In such a hyped IPO, any kind of valuation is possible. But a comparison with the history of the social network’s closest thing to a rival, Google, suggests that even $75 billion – at the low end of the talk to date – would be a stretch. A new Breakingviews calculator shows why, and allows bulls and bears alike to tweak the inputs.
So, let’s not quibble since we’re guessing at future cash flows anyway, and let’s start with the $75 billion valuation.
Let’s then:
- Subtract, say, $1 trillion for the lost productivity caused by Americans wasting away their lives “Friending” people they really don’t care about anyway
+ And add back, say, $100 for the extra productivity from us because our deadbeat brothers-in-law now stay at home playing Zynga with “Friends” on-line instead of dropping by for a beer.
There.
We figure Young Zuckerberg and his band of Merry Hackers, the new 20-somethings who have innovated the United States into a fearsome new advertising- and on-line-game based economy, owe America: ($75,000,000,000 – $1,000,000,000,000 + $100 = ) $924,999,999,900.
We’ll take installments. They can send their first $75 billion to the Treasury and work off the rest assembling iGadgets made in the new Apple plant being built by Mike Moore in Flint, Michigan. Since there are exactly 17 employees working in Facebook, this new economy company, the debt works out to about $54 billion per head. We figure it’ll take them, productive as they are, 54,000 years each to make repayment, a little less, perhaps, with some inflation.
Our thanks to Reuters for helping solve this vexing public policy issue.
EU eases insurers’ worst capital fears – for now
By George Hay
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
For the first time in a month, UK insurers’ pulses are slowing down. On March 21 the European Parliament signed amendments to the EU’s new Solvency II legislation, which in February looked set to deal them a nasty blow. But insurers – and pension providers – can’t yet afford to breathe easily.

















