Changing China

Giant on the move

Disaster in Sichuan

May 21, 2008

Earthquake damage in Dujiangyan

I was one of the first foreign reporters on the scene after a devastating earthquake hit the southwestern Chinese province of Sichuan on May 12.

It all seemed so normal when I arrived in the provincial capital Chengdu, some 12 hours after the 7.9 magnitude tremor hit, that I thought maybe the area had got off lightly. But heading in the hard hit town of Dujiangyan, just north of Chengdu, two hours after arriving in Sichuan, I realised how bad the situation was.

Dujiangyan looked like a war zone. There wasn’t a building that had not been damaged. Some had lost just a wall, or had a few cracks. Others had crumpled into the ground, as though a giant foot had descended from out of the sky and stamped on them.

Survivors, for the main part, either stood around in a state of total shock, or huddled together in tents, buses and cars, trying to avoid the drizzle that made what was already a depressing scene a thoroughly miserable and distressing one.

We had heard that a school in the town had collapsed. Finding it was not a problem — everyone could point the way there.

Having seen bodies lying in the streets I thought I would be emotionally and mentally prepared for what I would see next. I was wrong.

A soldier holds back relatives trying to enter a collapsed school building, after an earthquake in Dujiangyan City

Soldiers and police had formed a cordon around the school to prevent overwrought relatives from rushing onto the rubble and look for their children themselves. In none of my stories from Dujiangyan did I quote one of these relatives directly.

I couldn’t talk to them; it upset me too much. I tried, but when I thought I might burst into tears myself, I had to look away, almost ashamed that I was unable to perform the job that I had been sent there to do — report.

In the days that followed what impressed me most was the huge outpouring of kindness from people in cities like Chengdu which had not been as badly affected by the quake.

At one refugee centre at a stadium in the city of Mianyang, where thousands had sought shelter, I saw an endless stream of voulunteers coming in bringing whatever they thought would help.

One lady from a village next to the stadium had cooked up a huge vat of rice porridge and brought it over on the back of her tricycle, and was busy handing it out to anyone who wanted it. “I just had to help,” she told me.

Others brought in bags of clothes, bottles of water and packs of instant noodles. One volunteer tried to give me some water, saying she thought I looked like a “hard-pressed reporter”. I was touched by the sentiment, but could only decline and insist she give the bottles to survivors, who needed it a lot more than me.

In the last few months a swirl of bad publicity has surrounded China in the run-up to this summer’s Beijing Olympics — notably with the problems in Tibet and the violence that accompanied parts of the international leg of the Olympic torch relay. It will be interesting to see how global public opinion, if you can call it that, will be affected by this earthquake, and if the almost incessant criticism of China now ends, or at least abates for a while.

Pictures of relatives trying to enter a collapsed school building and resident walking past a row of destroyed houses, both in Dujiangyan, by Claro Cortes IV/Reuters


“…and if the almost incessant criticism of China now ends, or at least abates for a while.”

Mr. Blanchard seems to have reopened the floodgates with his poor reporting of the mosque being demolished. Why is it only one side of the story ever come to light? And it’s always the side that seems to be sensualized.

I am not the reporter here, so go and find out what the other ‘real’ reasons may be why that mosque was demolished.

Posted by John Lamb | Report as abusive

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see