Reuters Blogs

Changing China

Giant on the move

23:41 July 31st, 2008

Haze clears but doping cloud darkens

Posted by: Kevin Fylan
Tags: Countdown to Beijing, , , , , ,

Baldini in a file photoI flew into Beijing today and was pretty surprised to find clear blue skies. Smog? What smog?

Maybe it will last, maybe not, but it’s clear that the issue of drugs in sport is not going away. Italian fencer Andrea Baldini became the latest athlete to fail a doping test in the run-up to the Games, as it was revealed on Friday that the gold medal hopeful had tested positive for the diuretic furosemide in Kiev last month.

Baldini has said he is innocent but he has been suspended pending the B sample. If that confirms the result he will miss the Games.

The news is the latest doping blow to the Olympics. On Thursday we heard that seven leading Russian women athletes would miss the Games after the IAAF said they were suspected of manipulating samples.

IOC president Jacques Rogge was recently quoted as saying that 40 athletes might test positive at the Games. Sadly, that number would not longer be much of a surprise.

FILE PHOTO: Italy’s Andrea Baldini at the World Fencing Championship in St. Petersburg in September, 2007. REUTERS/Alexander Demianchuk

4 comments so far

It never ceases to amaze that so many would risk so much to take drugs!

- Posted by Jo in Beijing

Yes, another beautiful day in paradise! Hopefully the weather can stay this way for 3 more weeks.

- Posted by Mike

Nice again today, I must say. In fact, a few colleagues have told me Los Angeles and Seoul were just as smoggy…

- Posted by Kevin Fylan

Full story here: http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Olymp ics/idUSL25490520080802

- Posted by Kevin Fylan

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.