Three reasons U.S. homeowners shouldn’t lose hope
American homeowners already depressed by the shrunken value of their biggest asset should skip the International Monetary Fund’s latest missive on the risk of a double dip in property prices. The fund’s grim outlook is hard to dispute. But three historic measures now suggest that homeowners can put down the revolver.
Buying property has been an emotional rollercoaster over recent years, carrying owners from the heights of smugness for their quick profits to the depths of despondency. Residential home prices fell close to a third between 2006 and 2009 leaving a trail of shell-shocked proprietors. And the IMF says the pain may not be over yet.
Petrobras $79 bln capital hike relies on bull case
Petrobras seems to be banking on the bull case for buying its stock. Despite the investment risks, it has upsized its already huge offering to as much as $79 billion. The Brazilian oil giant is hoping enough investors really think it can deliver on its plans.
Over the past year Brazil’s government has given shareholders plenty of reason to view the glass as half empty. Brasilia foisted $74 billion of not very profitable refinery investment on Petrobras over the next five years. And the government is overcharging the company for 5 billion barrels of new oil reserves, in return for which it is collecting $43 billion of stock.
Oil supply shift is airline omen and chemical boon
A looming shift in oil supply heralds significant changes for two industries. Traditional crude output is forecast to plateau over the next five years with lighter liquids providing the bulk of supply growth instead. This should lower costs for chemical producers. It might also be a fresh ailment for just-recovering airlines.
Old-style oil is getting harder to find. Production growth should grind to a halt by 2015, according to Cambridge Energy Research Associates. From then, any extra supply will come from natural gas liquids and condensates, which were once discarded by oil producers.
Airgas vote puts goal in reach for Air Products
Airgas shareholders have decided whence the hot air was blowing. By voting for three directors nominated by predator Air Products, ousting the Airgas chief executive from the board and agreeing to move up the next shareholder meeting, they rebuffed fishy incumbent claims that the firm is worth more alone.
Directors may scramble to the courts but their moral authority has been undermined. With Airgas closer to its clutches, Air Products may be able to remain firmer on its $5.5 billion hostile bid.
Brazil’s oil windfall raises risk of Dutch disease
Petrobras’ planned $32 billion capital-raising is just the start of an influx of foreign cash that could over-inflate the Brazilian currency and strangle manufacturers. Soaring oil output will add to the problem. Chilean or Norwegian discipline is needed.
Rather than spurring economic development, resource windfalls have often sucked investment from other sectors and stunted industrialization — the so-called Dutch disease, a term coined in the 1970s after revenue from large natural gas finds in the Netherlands ended up constraining the nation’s manufacturers. A resource bonanza also encourages politicians to lock in high government spending, sparking inflation and linking the nation’s fate to commodity prices.
Eike Batista has sweeter barrels than Petrobras
Eike Batista may soon be adding billions to his bank balance. Shares of energy group OGX — the flagship vehicle of Batista, Brazil’s richest man — value its 7 billion-odd shallow water oil reserves at roughly $5 a barrel. That looks a bargain against the $8.51 the government is extracting from Petrobras for deepwater crude. It’s no wonder China’s Sinopec Group and CNOOC are considering buying into assets owned by the company.
A $100 punt on OGX last September would now be worth $180, compared with a meager $80 in national champion Petrobras and $113 in Brazil’s Bovespa stock index. Yet OGX could still be good value for money — especially in the light of Petrobras’ recent deal with the government for new reserves.
Petrobras samba with government may not be over
– The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own –
Brazil’s government gouged oil giant Petrobras <PETR4.SA><PBR.N> in its $42 billion transfer of offshore reserves. But at least it seemed to lift some uncertainty. Think again: the contract may allow Brazil to raise the price, regulatory filings suggest. For those worried by state meddling, this is yet another troubling disclosure.
Petrobras deal shows it’s more Gazprom than Exxon
Petrobras is shaping up more like Gazprom than Exxon Mobil. By overpaying for 5 billion barrels of reserves, the Brazilian state-controlled oil group is transferring up to $17 billion of value to the government, whose stake will also rise. The company is looking more like an instrument of the state than a guardian of shareholder interests.
A year after the capitalization plan was first announced, Petrobras shareholders are finally getting some clarity. That earned a relief rally in the company’s beaten-down shares on Thursday. But the news overall isn’t good.
Potash CEO’s big payday won’t decide the deal
Half a billion dollars is normally sufficient to sway the minds of mortals. But in the case of Potash Corp’s potential sale to BHP Billiton, don’t expect such a big payday to decide the outcome of the deal. The fertilizer miner’s boss Bill Doyle has sat on larger sums before and held tight. With his golden parachute less than 6 percent of the payoff, he has no obvious incentive to shortchange shareholders with a quick flip of the company.
True, even if Potash shareholders go for the BHP deal on offer Doyle would become one of the top corporate earners of the past decade in North America. And it’s hard to imagine that so lucrative a package of stock options as Potash doled out to Doyle was entirely necessary to motivate him over the years.
Coal can’t revel in its regulatory dodge
U.S. coal miners dodged a bullet when Congress ditched cap-and-trade regulation. But they may still be vulnerable. Carbon tax or not, many geriatric coal generators are heading for retirement. And demand from China may not be the silver bullet investors expect.
There’s no denying that a price on carbon would have been grim news. For the first time in years, once-pricey natural gas had been giving cheap coal a run for its money, leading some electric producers to switch to gas. Even a small nudge from a cap-and-trade system could have accelerated the switch to the cleaner burning fuel. Small wonder then that the likes of Peabody and Walter Energy have outperformed the S&P 500 Index by close to 10 percent since lawmakers abandoned the cap-and-trade idea at the end of July.

