Bankslaughter

July 1, 2009

There are criminal investigations into the events of the recent financial crisis. The two managers of the Bear Stearns hedge funds that blew up in the summer of 2007 have been indicted in Brooklyn, and more cases in other venues and more charges against executives will certainly be brought.

Yet there is still a palpable public frustration that the wheels of justice are moving too slowly or that it will be too difficult to prove fraud when really recklesness or incompetence were to blame. Several commentators in Britain have suggested that a lower standard of criminal culpability be established when banks die. There is a name for this crime: bankslaughter.

Paul Collier in the Guardian writes:

With bankslaughter, when the bank blows up – even if it is a decade later – a criminal investigation traces back to determine whether crucial decisions were reckless. If a reasonable banker faced with the information available at the time would not have taken those risks, the person responsible is dragged off the golf course and jailed.

Once bankslaughter was on the books, bonuses would be less dangerous. Managers would have to weigh the balance between risk and return and take defensible decisions. I doubt hyper-caution would be a problem: the overly cautious would not get bonuses. Surely we can rely on our bankers to exhibit the necessary degree of greed.

Timothy Garton Ash, who appears to have first come up with the name, expressed skepticism about the idea when he wrote about it (also in the Guardian) in May:

A friend who has spent a lifetime studying the world’s poorest economies argues that such bankers should face personal legal consequences for their selfish folly. There should, he suggests, be a crime of bankslaughter, comparable to manslaughter in the sense that you don’t have to prove malice aforethought. A wonderful idea but not, I think, practical, or ultimately even desirable – since it would mean violating the fundamental legal principle that something is a crime only if it was illegal at the time you did it

Bankslaughter may never become a new category of crime, but it would be a great name for a politically aware heavy-metal bank.

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/