Comments on: Stanford investors get fleeced again http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/ Now raising intellectual capital Sun, 08 Nov 2015 08:31:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: JOE http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1259 Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:54:51 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=1657#comment-1259 WHEN THE LAWYERS GET INVOLVED THE VICTIMS FOR SURE LOOSE THEIR MONEY………..WHY DO THEY NEED A SPECIALLY APPOINTED ATTORNEY WHEN THE GOV. HAS BILLIONS OF ATTORNEYS ON THEIR PAYROLL ALREADY THAT CAN DO THIS JOB. BECAUSE THE APPOINTED ATTORNEYS SPLIT THEIR FEE WITH THE JUDGE THAT APPOINTS THEM ITS AS SIMPLE AS A PONZI SCHEME AND JUST AS ROTTEN, LOW DOWN AND STEALS THE REMAINDER OF THE INVESTORS MONEY WHICH THE JUDGES AND STTORNEYS THINK IS NOW THEIRS FOR THE TAKING……….SORRY VICTIMS AINT NOBODY LOOKIN OUT FOR YOU……..BRING BACK THE GOOD OLD DAYS……..BEAT THEIR ASSES TO A PULP AND THE HORSE THEY RODE UP ON…..

]]>
By: James Reginald Harris, Jr http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1247 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:11:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=1657#comment-1247 LOL. While the attorney on the ‘other’ securities fraud case rakes in SEC Civil Process Fees, I have been referred to a homeless shelter with my 5 year old daughter and the engineer gets a presidential appointment! Waiting penniless while they negotiate a ‘bigger fee’…

Once your a crime victim We’re all just a social security number on a billable hour. Over which in such cases, we have no control or recourse.

Aint it Great!

ROTFLMAO

]]>
By: Robert Vysther http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1246 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:08:10 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=1657#comment-1246 I Like the comment posted by rich. The banks are even bigger scammers than those creeps.

]]>
By: rich http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1245 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:57:19 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=1657#comment-1245 The difference between the Stanfords and Madoffs of the world and the big investment banks is that the banks have a whole company full of them.

]]>
By: Art Perrone http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1243 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:52:39 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=1657#comment-1243 Lets bring back the good old days. In Hillsboro NC in 1770 they closed the courts, threatened the judges and publically whipped the attorneys.

]]>
By: Charles http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1241 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:51:50 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=1657#comment-1241 Yea real amusing stuff.. kind of reminds us how we, a small business got screwed by HUGE investment firm that became “creditor” in a CH11 filing. Background.. company C// levels called and contracted us for services.. then two weeks after paying us (and 600 other firms) filed Ch11. Seems the law and there is NO defense.. if paid within 90 days of Ch11 file, you pay it ALL back. NOTE company never said a word of CH11, but had hired “Expert C// levels and CFO on how to go to CH11.. AKA THEY KNEW THEY WOULD GET IT ALL BACK… from us and 600 other firms.. They wrecked out lives and shut down our small business. but it was “legal”.. so not to much sympathy for these guys.. and wait til the “Record nr of CH11 filings hit with good ole CH11 547c.. as thousands of small business going to get a big surprise in mail. they have TWO years after CH11 to drag you into local fed court in THEIR area.. there is NO defense.. and congress will NOT discuss not will media.

]]>
By: Timbo http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/07/24/stanford-investors-get-fleeced-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1238 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:39:40 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=1657#comment-1238 The receivers appointed by the Antiguan govt seem to more of the victim’s interests at heart than Mr Janvey. He is going through the little money that is left like a drunken sailor. High time he is reined in.

]]>