Comments on: Kroll’s roll in the Stanford muck http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/11/krolls-roll-in-the-stanford-muck/ Now raising intellectual capital Sun, 08 Nov 2015 08:31:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: CharlieD http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/11/krolls-roll-in-the-stanford-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-17882 Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:44:20 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=3892#comment-17882 I was a private investigator for ten years and worked for a leading law firm for 15 years, doing due diligence. Kroll should have shed its bad apples on its own, before any unsavory relationships with Stanford could develop. One must wonder how many more toxic and explosive relationships are in Kroll’s pipeline. It’s most important investigation should have been an internal one that would have prevented this outcome and black mark.

]]>
By: Firebird http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/11/krolls-roll-in-the-stanford-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-5891 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:17:05 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=3892#comment-5891 I concur with Bonner’s assessment. Having experience with both the ilk of Cash and Raffanello, I must agree that the accusations against them could not fit better than a Hong Kong suit maker could conjure up.

]]>
By: Rob Bonner http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/11/krolls-roll-in-the-stanford-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-5383 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:03:54 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=3892#comment-5383 Tom Cash never investigated anything in his career. He is a fraud and a BS artist

]]>
By: Casper http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/11/krolls-roll-in-the-stanford-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-4235 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:38:50 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=3892#comment-4235 Presumably these are ‘off-the-record’ due diligences – isn’t that illegal without the aquiree’s consent ? Isn’t there legislation for record retention periods ?

]]>
By: Tom http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/11/krolls-roll-in-the-stanford-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-4111 Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:14:23 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=3892#comment-4111 As I understand it, when the document destruction began Stanford was already on the front pages of every newspaper as an alledged master swindler on a monstrously large scale. Anyone involved in destroying his records from that point on had better begin getting their own affairs in order.

]]>