<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dell shows discipline in opting for Perot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/21/dell-shows-discipline-in-opting-for-perot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/21/dell-shows-discipline-in-opting-for-perot/</link>
	<description>Now raising intellectual capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techno</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/21/dell-shows-discipline-in-opting-for-perot/comment-page-1/#comment-4911</link>
		<dc:creator>Techno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=4397#comment-4911</guid>
		<description>Wrong. Buying Perot is an error made in desperation. It will fail. 

Dell rode the PC curve not as a technology company, but as an efficient commodity assembler, marketer, supply chain optimizer. One can only grow such business for so long. Because real technology company can always defeat you in a number of ways - new inventions in HW and SW not available to Dell, more efficient distribution of manufacturing for  new products. Expansion of product lines which yield higher profits. Witness HP winning the game long term. 

A company like Dell, so focused on commodity and assembly, will fail when taking on technology services. Very very companies can make the combination. IBM, HP are just about it. None in Japan, Taiwan, Europe, and no other in US. Because successful technology service require a whole new culture, business model - new kind of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong. Buying Perot is an error made in desperation. It will fail. </p>
<p>Dell rode the PC curve not as a technology company, but as an efficient commodity assembler, marketer, supply chain optimizer. One can only grow such business for so long. Because real technology company can always defeat you in a number of ways &#8211; new inventions in HW and SW not available to Dell, more efficient distribution of manufacturing for  new products. Expansion of product lines which yield higher profits. Witness HP winning the game long term. </p>
<p>A company like Dell, so focused on commodity and assembly, will fail when taking on technology services. Very very companies can make the combination. IBM, HP are just about it. None in Japan, Taiwan, Europe, and no other in US. Because successful technology service require a whole new culture, business model &#8211; new kind of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phone Reviews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/09/21/dell-shows-discipline-in-opting-for-perot/comment-page-1/#comment-4906</link>
		<dc:creator>Phone Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/?p=4397#comment-4906</guid>
		<description>Once again, Dell plays follow the leader. HP bought a Plano-based services company, so Mikey did too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Dell plays follow the leader. HP bought a Plano-based services company, so Mikey did too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
