Now raising intellectual capital
from Neil Collins:
I can't decide whether this is an elegant spoof or a serious piece of academic research. At first sight, the answer's obvious, since it starts thus:
"Should the income tax system include a tax credit for short taxpayers and a tax surcharge for tall ones?"
Yet as youÂ read on, there's a relentless plausibility in the argument. It starts with the generally-accepted principle that tax is a way of redistributing money from the better-off to the worse off. It proceeds via studies showing that tall people (not too tall, presumably) generally do better than short ones in life's lottery, and concludes: What's wrong with taxing height?
The answer, say N Gregory Mankiw and Matthew Weinzieri (I assume they are real people) is that "if a person rejects the policy of a tax on height, he must also reject, or significantly amend, the standard utilitarian approach to optimal taxation and income redistribution."