Commodity Corner

Views on commodities and energy

Jul 23, 2009 14:19 EDT

Oil Market Contango Widening

Photo

The spread between front-month oil futures and contracts for later delivery on the New York Mercantile Exchange (see Fig. 1) has widened dramatically this month. (See Fig. 2)The widening contango frequently portends a rise in inventories. For example, in Fig. 3, it can be seen that when the discount for fronth-month crude to second-month crude widened to near $4 a barrel earlier this year, inventories jumped to 19-year highs. The relationship between inventories and the outright futures price can be seen in Fig. 4. 

May 7, 2009 13:01 EDT

Correlation Between Oil and Equities Markets

Photo

Oil prices have been trading in an unusually strong positive correlation with equities markets over the past few months on hopes that signs of an economic recovery could mean a boost for energy demand.

But with oil and product inventories swelling and little sign of demand improving in the United States and other big developed economies, analysts warn that the linkage may be hard to maintain, especially if U.S. motorists cut back on vacations this summer.

COMMENT

We are not at the economic threshold of return yet where we can handle higher prices in energies. If energies run up the economy will be pushed deeper into recession, perhaps even depression. The energy bubble caused a chain reaction of dissent in over-all financial stability. If energies…specifically oil began moving up at this time we will face economic times like we have not experienced for 70 years.

Posted by Alan | Report as abusive
Mar 5, 2009 13:33 EST

NYMEX First to Second Month Crude Spread

Photo

The spread between the front month and second month oil futures continues to narrow.

The deep spread seen in earlier this year, caused primarily by slumping fuel demand due to the economic crisis, was heightened by the monthly of passive investment funds, especially the giant United States Oil Fund. On Feb. 6, when the fund last rolled its positions from the first to second month futures conracts, it held movre than 20 percent of the front month.

Analysts said that the move by the exchange traded fund to roll its front month positions to the second month over a four day period — rather than on just one day — may lesson the volatility of the shift.

Mar 2, 2009 13:17 EST

NYMEX Contango Narrows

Photo

 

 

The contango in the NYMEX futures curve has begun to narrow as OPEC production cuts begin to bite and U.S. gasoline demand shows signs of rebounding.

Feb 11, 2009 11:51 EST

Open Interest in U.S. Crude Oil Futures

Photo

Open interest and trading volumes in commodity futures markets have shown some resilience at the start of 2009 despite the dramatic price slides triggered by the economic downturn.

In the fourth quarter of 2008, open interest in U.S. crude oil futures fell to levels not seen since mid-2006 as the global economic crisis hit fuel demand and sent prices tumbling, before rebounding.

COMMENT

this graph raises a question the number of contracts depends on the level of oil prices or on the level of economic activity ?

Posted by Vittorio | Report as abusive
Sep 22, 2008 16:29 EDT

Commodities roundup: Oil rally unleashed, how much more left

Photo

“Short squeeze, crude expiration — that’s it in a nutshell.”

So says Tom Knight of Truman Arnold in Texas of the near 16% surge in U.S. crude for October to $120.92 a barrel. Among other factors in the energy markets today:

* TARP, the Sec. Paulson-led rescue plan for U.S. banks, has changed sentiment for oil, some analysts are arguing. (A 2% rally in gold amid a weaker dollar lends some support to an re-allocation assumption) * Saudi Arabia trims oil supply to majors * Nigerian rebels declare unilateral cease-fire * U.S. oil sector recovering from Ike

How much more to go? “The dollar is down, the stocks are down and now investulators are jumping back into oil,” says Peter Beutel, analyst at Cameron Hanover in Connecticut. More views on the market today are here.

COMMENT

Doris Frankel informed your readers that ETF shed 114% of its value when the price went from $63.75 to $29.02. Please tell Doris that this is a 54% reduction; there is no such thing as a 114% reduction. If the price went from $63.75 to -0-, the reduction would be 100%.

Posted by Gary Jarmon | Report as abusive