Now on Netflix: gravity
Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, itâ€™s just a matter of checking a box if youâ€™re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.
Netflixâ€™s third-quarter earnings report contained a lot of great news: profits, revenue, and new subscriber numbers were all much higher than this quarter last year — plus the company finally surpassed HBO in number of subscribers (domestically, at least).
Itâ€™s now clear that Netflix sees premium cable networks as its competition: In an interview with Nancy Hass earlier this year, Netflixâ€™s chief content officer, Ted Sarandos,Â said, “the goal is to become HBO faster than HBO can become usâ€ť. In the interview, he also floated ideas about radically changing the way that television is presented, down to the basic structure of an episodic series. Netflix is also reportedly in talks with Comcast and Suddenlink Communications to make its app viewable on cable boxes.
Netflixâ€™s share price spiked to $382 from $354 overnight Monday, only to end the day back at $322 after rumors spread that Carl Icahn had dumped his shares. He later confirmed on TwitterÂ that he halved his stake. But the â€śplungeâ€ť just put it back where it opened last Thursday. Itâ€™s current share price is up 480% from this time last year.
The question, says Michael Santoli, is â€śwhether the shares are wildly overvalued by a herd of deluded momentum investors, or properly pricey to account for the companyâ€™s stellar growth record and vast opportunities to grab an enormous share of the paid media economyâ€ť.
CEO Reed Hastings seemed somewhat skeptical of the market in his letter to investors, comparing todayâ€™s situation to his companyâ€™s situation a decade ago. In 2003, Netflixâ€™s stock price surged to $38 from around $2 per share (remember DVD-by-mail?), only to drop back down to $10 in mid-2004 after Blockbuster, Walmart, and Amazon all seemed poised to be competitive with Netflixâ€™s DVD business. â€śIn calendar year 2003 we were the highest performing stock on Nasdaq. We had solid results compounded by momentum-investor-fueled euphoria. Some of the euphoria today feels like 2003â€ť, Hastings writes.
No company gets to be worth twice as much in 60 days as it was before to any intelligent person, so when that happens, we take advantage of it. If everybody is so hungry for shares, we let them have some. If the shares go down, we buy them.
And the price may soon be going down, according to Lazard analyst Barton Crockett. Buried in the earnings announcement was news that the company may soon change its accounting practices to pay the bulk of negotiated license fees upfront, instead of over the course of the contract, because its viewers tend to tune in right after a new show is released. Â – Shane Ferro
On to todayâ€™s links: