Paying taxes your employer keeps

By David Cay Johnston
July 19, 2011

By David Cay Johnston
The author is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Painful as it feels to have a lot of hard-earned income taken from your paycheck for taxes, a new Illinois law does something Americans may find surprising. It lets some employers pocket taxes for 10 years.

You read that right — in Illinois the state income taxes withheld from your paycheck may be kept by your employer under a law that took effect in May. Continental Corporation, the big German tire maker; Motorola Mobility, the cell phone maker; and Navistar, the maker of diesel trucks for industry and the military, are in on the deal. State officials say a fourth company is negotiating a similar arrangement.

Chrysler and Mitsubishi arranged deals with the state in the depths of the Great Recession in 2009; Ford got one in 2007, since revised to let it keep half of its Illinois workers’ state income taxes. (See chart below.)

Instead of paying for police, teachers, roads and other state and local services that grease the wheels of commerce, Illinois workers at these companies will subsidize their employers with the state income taxes they pay.

The deal to let employers keep half or all of their workers’ state income taxes represents a dramatic expansion of a little-known trend in the law: diverting taxes from public purposes to private gain.

Throughout the United States, big box retailers like Wal-Mart, Lowe’s and Cabela’s, and in some cases entire shopping malls, often negotiate deals to keep sales taxes that customers pay at the cash register, using the money to finance construction of their stores. This gives them a huge advantage over retailers without such subsidies, while reducing revenue to local governments, which in turn creates pressure for higher taxes.

COMPETITION BETWEEN STATES
The pipeline industry, a collection of legal monopolies with rates that are regulated, gets to include the federal corporate income tax in the rates charged customers even though nearly all pipelines are exempt from the federal corporate income tax because they are organized as master limited partnerships. Evidence in one federal court case showed that collecting this tax, plus state income taxes, and then pocketing the taxes increased ultimate net after-tax profits by 75 percent.

The Illinois deal shows how competition between the states, and with other countries, helps big corporations wring subsidies from state governments even as the states are being forced to fire teachers and other public workers because of a weak economy that has cost jobs and tax revenue.

Why would the state let companies do this? Most big companies pay little or no state corporate income tax, because companies arrange to take expenses in higher tax states and profits in states with little or no corporate income tax. So the only way to finance incentives without the state writing a check is to let the companies pocket their workers’ state income tax.

The Illinois deal also shows how government, rather than the market, picks winners and losers. While America promotes the dream of a free market and competition, this sort of corporate socialism has been around since before the founding of the republic and has played a key role in the rise of many industries, including railroads, aircraft, as well as computer hardware and software.

Warren Ribley, director of the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, said “it’s a fair question” as to whether taxpayers should be subsidizing businesses. He said elected leaders and the public should debate the issue.

“In the meantime,” Ribley said, “I am out there competing every single day with states and countries across the entire globe and I have got to have the tools and I have to use the tools provided by the General Assembly,” as the Illinois legislature is formally known.

State Representative Jack Franks, a Democrat from the northern end of Illinois, said the deals “are fundamentally unfair” to taxpayers and other companies.

“Our current governor had the genius idea of giving to Motorola and Navistar and others, he said to retain their business here, yet he is allowing Navistar to fire up to 25 percent of their workforce and still get millions from the state” by holding onto the income taxes of employees.

OTHERS LIKELY TO FOLLOW
The Illinois law lets companies retain all of the income taxes withheld from the paychecks of workers whose hiring expands the payroll and half of the taxes for existing workers whose jobs are retained.

For Continental the deal means $22 million over 10 years diverted to its coffers from the state income taxes withheld from worker paychecks to help pay for a $224 million expansion of its Mount Vernon tire plant in southern Illinois. The deal will retain 2,500 jobs and create 400 more rather than prompt the plant to move to Mexico, Brazil or another state.

The hourly tire workers, under a two-tier pay scale that means lower wages for new hires, make either $19.35 an hour or $16.31 an hour. For a year that is pay of just under $34,000 to $40,000.

Based on a 3 percent average Illinois state income tax rate for people in that income range, and assuming Continental’s 2,500 hourly workers remain at the higher wage rate and 400 new workers are hired at the lower wage rate, the annual diversion of their income taxes would be as much as $1.9 million of the average $2.2 million annual benefit from the deal. Taxes paid by supervisors and managers, and expected higher wages in future years, account for the other $300,000 per year or so for the next decade.

Navistar is getting the deal even though its application shows it plans to reduce its workforce of 3,100 to about 2,200.

Ribley said companies that got earlier deals in which they avoided the state corporate income tax and then failed to create or retain jobs as promised have actually paid back the benefits.

The three companies that got the deal are not named in the law enacted in May, but the language of Public Act 97-2 defines them by describing the industry, employment level and other specifics that show how the law was tailored to benefit just them.

Here’s a prediction: other states soon will also authorize diverting income taxes withheld from worker paychecks to their employers, if some have not done so already — unless, of course, voters speak up on behalf of competitive markets and against this sort of corporate socialism.  (Editing by Howard Goller)

12 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

What will happen when one of these companies go bust ? Do the employees still needs to pay up ?

Posted by FBreughel1 | Report as abusive

So withholding a company’s taxes for 10 years (after which, of course, they have to pay them back) so that the company can provide jobs for state residents is “socialism”??

Give me a break. Socialism the government’s CHARGING too much tax in the first place, and invariably wasting the money. They will always misallocate tax money to do whatever makes them look good and gets them elected. If a resident or a business doesn’t like it, their only choice is to leave. Then the government in its wisdom steps in and says, Oh no wait, we didn’t mean it, here’s some money back, please stay. If you leave, we’ll look bad! That’s all they care about.

But the people who live in the state care about jobs. The government can’t provide them. The government can do very little, other than mess things up. Of course the tax system is screwed up, everything the government does is screwed up. So they should do as little as possible, and we should elect people who agree with that concept.

Posted by NewsLady | Report as abusive

Where is the representation from this tax?

Posted by GreyWolfSC | Report as abusive

@ Fbreughel1,

The workers are at zero risk on their taxes. Once taxes are withheld from your pay — unless you were participating in a fraud — the federal and state governments considered them paid.

@ NewsLady,

You misread my column; the companies keep the taxes for ten years, they do not give them back so long asa they meet the terms of the deal.

After ten years the normal flow of taxes to state government will resume.

Posted by DavidCayJ | Report as abusive

Newslady, the statement was “corporate socialism”. In the mean time employment is not growing fast enough to offset government revenue shortfalls. Incumbents do not need to misappropriate. They receive millions in corporate campaign funds. The tax breaks these companies get fund the legal bribes they return to the legislators that voted for the tax breaks in the first place.

FOLLOW THE MONEY! This is neither socialism or capitalism. These kind of government tax policies are text book Fascism.

Posted by coyotle | Report as abusive

@GreyWolf

You are right this is not socialism but actually more like the Aristocratic system the French had before their revolution. Back then the poor had to support the rich by paying taxes to the local Aristocrat. Mafia protection money and payments to local warlords in Africa and Afghanistan are very similar.
Most won’t accept this but using prisoners as unpaid labor is a form of slavery.

Are the American people really going to let their hard won freedoms be taken away again without even a murmur.
It is so sad to see the mighty USA degenerate like this.

Posted by Sinbad1 | Report as abusive

America gets more and more retarded everyday.

Posted by hitmanpro1 | Report as abusive

Crooks!

Posted by Intriped | Report as abusive

” Most big companies pay little or no state corporate income tax, because companies arrange to take expenses in higher tax states and profits in states with little or no corporate income tax”

Any data or studies to confirm this?

Posted by TinyOne | Report as abusive

Obama/Capone State.

Posted by Intriped | Report as abusive

Illinois Public Laws are in a 3-digit/4-digit format, and this is 097-0002. I think this is the reference: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicac ts/fulltext.asp?Name=097-0002&GA=97

Posted by shellayla | Report as abusive

Illinois Public Laws are in a 3-digit/4-digit format, and this is 097-0002. I think this is the reference: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicac ts/fulltext.asp?Name=097-0002&GA=97

Posted by shellayla | Report as abusive