<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In New York, gifts circumvent a ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2011/11/29/in-new-york-gifts-circumvent-a-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2011/11/29/in-new-york-gifts-circumvent-a-ban/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:49:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewslyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2011/11/29/in-new-york-gifts-circumvent-a-ban/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewslyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/?p=206#comment-706</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;GlobalFoundries says that upstate New York is a costly place to do business and that, but for the subsidy to offset these higher costs, it would have built the plant elsewhere.&quot;

In other words, New York State&#039;s subsidy to GlobalFoundries stole profitable business from some other place, and furthermore if the plant wouldn&#039;t have been profitable without the subsidy, the subsidy brought unprofitable business into New York State! According to the obvious conclusions of GlobalFoundries argument, this is a lose-lose situation for New York and for everyone else!

What else is the &quot;free market&quot; good for, if not for directing work, goods and services to the places where it&#039;s most profitable?

There&#039;s a very strong smell of something else going on behind the scenes in this judgement. Could it be something to do with the need to keep Gulf-of-Hormuz states on-side for any potential conflict with Iran, by giving them a financial interest in America, and in New York specifically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> &#8220;GlobalFoundries says that upstate New York is a costly place to do business and that, but for the subsidy to offset these higher costs, it would have built the plant elsewhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, New York State&#8217;s subsidy to GlobalFoundries stole profitable business from some other place, and furthermore if the plant wouldn&#8217;t have been profitable without the subsidy, the subsidy brought unprofitable business into New York State! According to the obvious conclusions of GlobalFoundries argument, this is a lose-lose situation for New York and for everyone else!</p>
<p>What else is the &#8220;free market&#8221; good for, if not for directing work, goods and services to the places where it&#8217;s most profitable?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a very strong smell of something else going on behind the scenes in this judgement. Could it be something to do with the need to keep Gulf-of-Hormuz states on-side for any potential conflict with Iran, by giving them a financial interest in America, and in New York specifically?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UMSLstudent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2011/11/29/in-new-york-gifts-circumvent-a-ban/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>UMSLstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/?p=206#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Excellent, thanks from your students at UMSL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, thanks from your students at UMSL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
