Opinion

David Rohde

A new Paul Ryan?

By David Rohde
October 11, 2013

This week, Representative Paul D. Ryan (R-Wi.) may have made himself a leading Republican presidential contender in 2016. By proposing an end to the budget impasse that did not include one word — Obamacare — Ryan may have outmaneuvered Senators Rand Paul (R- Ky.) and Ted Cruz (R- Texas).

Multiple proposals are under consideration in Washington. If Ryan’s plan becomes the basis for a bipartisan budget agreement, it will boost his standing and be a body blow to the Tea Party.

Ryan is clearly trying to position himself as a fiscal conservative who is serious about addressing the country’s deficit problem — without destroying the U.S. economy in the process. He is trying to win the support of the moderate Republicans and mainstream business leaders increasingly exasperated by the Tea Party’s flirtation with default.

Along with not insisting that Obamacare be part of any deal, Ryan dropped his controversial proposal to turn Medicare into a voucher program.

“Right now, we need to find common ground,” Ryan wrote in a Wednesday Wall Street Journal op-ed article that outlined his proposed deal. “We need to open the federal government.”

Ryan’s proposal has its problems. It only addresses the debt ceiling and includes conditions that President Barack Obama should reject. But it is an opportunity for negotiations and a potential path out of increasingly dangerous deadlock.

Obama should only sign a measure that reopens the government and raises the debt ceiling without conditions. But he should embrace a short-term deal that includes immediate fiscal talks with Republicans. Yes, kicking the can down the road for a month or two is not ideal — but it is far better than default.

Democrats are understandably wary of Ryan. He could be a far-right Trojan Horse. Faced with a default catastrophe, entitlement reforms that Republicans have been unable to enact for years look less painful. So do tax reforms that may benefit the wealthy. By positioning itself even farther to the right, skeptics argue, the Republican Party could get the fiscal reforms it wants.

But Democrats should realize that the current impasse is strengthening their hand. Four polls released this week show that the shutdown is doing far more damage to Republicans than Democrats. In short, the Tea Party is losing.

On Monday, an ABC News/Washington Post poll found that 70 percent of Americans disapprove of how Republicans are handling themselves in the budget impasse, a 7 percent increase since last week. In a bad sign for Cruz and Paul, 59 percent of Americans who identified themselves as conservatives said they disapproved of how the GOP has handled the issue as well.

Democrats are also suffering damage. Sixty percent of those polled said they disapproved of how Democrats were handling the dispute. And 51 percent said they disapproved of Obama’s performance. A Pew Research Center poll also released on Monday showed similar findings. Thirty-eight percent of Americans blamed Republicans for the shutdown while 30 percent blamed Obama.

On Thursday, a Gallup poll found a 10 percent drop in GOP approval rating — from 38 percent last month to 28 percent now. That was the lowest approval rating for the party since Gallup began asking the question in 1992.

And an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll also released on Thursday found that 53 percent of respondents blamed the Republican Party more for the shutdown and only 31 percent blamed Obama — a wider margin of blame for the GOP than during the 1995-1996 shutdown.

Whether or not Ryan is being politically opportunistic, he is showing more courage than House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), whose primary concern appears to be appeasing the House’s Tea Party Caucus so he can remain speaker.

Ryan is playing to his base: fiscal conservatives. In his opinion piece, Ryan proposed mean-testing Medicare premiums so that the wealthy pay more, reforming the Medigap program and forcing federal employees to contribute more to their own retirement.

Ryan claimed that the savings from those three measures would be large enough to ease the across-the-board cuts — known as the sequester. Unlike some Tea Party members, he agrees that the sequester is a foolish way to cut spending.

“Most of us agree,” Ryan wrote, referring to Republicans and Democrats, “that gradual, structural reforms are better than sudden, arbitrary cuts.”

Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.), chairwoman of the Senate Budget Committee, told the New York Times on Thursday that she and Democrats have changed their view of Ryan after meeting with him dozens of times this year to try to find a compromise.

Murray and Ryan both said that they believed they could find common ground between the vastly different budgets enacted this year by the Democratic-controlled Senate and Republican-controlled House.

“Patty and I have a good relationship,” Ryan told the Times. “We don’t agree on much but we get along well.”

Ryan has disappointed before. He declined to be part of the “super committee” that was set up to avoid a default in 2011. At the time, his aspirations for higher office were seen as prompting him to be cautious.

Maybe, just maybe, the 2012 defeat tempered Ryan. One way to tell will be whether he continues to embrace conservative opposition to tax increases of any kind as part of a fiscal “grand bargain.”

A short-term delay will not solve our enormous political and fiscal problems. But it will show whether the Tea Party has peaked in influence. And whether Ryan has changed.

PHOTO: Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) departs after a news conference by U.S. Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) and other Republican House members in Washington October 10, 2013. REUTERS/Gary Cameron 

Comments
6 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

David: I disagree on one major point you’re trying to make….
‘In short, the Tea Party is losing.’
Wrong… The tea party has been fairly smart in this aspect. They planned ahead…. well ahead. They carefully and methodically crafted congressional districts that would nearly guarantee a perpetual succession of Republican officeholders. Then, over time drove those districts further and further to the right. This is merely a culmination of a well thought out plan, inaugurated years ago. They have not lost… Unfortunately.

Posted by edgyinchina | Report as abusive
 

I, too, disagree that the Tea Party is losing; unfortunately, the people who are “guiding” those whose fears have lead them to hate/distrust government, the federal government and Obama in particular, are in it for the long haul, and are sure that they can succeed with carefully (and often ridiculously) crafted congressional districts. This may not get a Republican in the White House, but it will keep the House of Representatives in the shape it is in today. UNLESS people such as Paul Ryan can show leadership and not just political savvy. I watched and listened to him on C-SPAN this evening, and when he wasn’t being cutesy, he made some very good points…

Posted by jlj | Report as abusive
 

The Ryan approach has to be a no-go. It would mean extending credit by two more months … with uncertainty which provides no framework for planning capital outlays. Cut spending and / or raise taxes but end the Cheney-style waterboarding of financial planning.

Posted by SanPa | Report as abusive
 

Next fiscal year the deficit will be 2% of gdp or less. What deficit problem? the only deficit problem we have is the deficit of sensible governing from the right!

Posted by repubsrcrazy | Report as abusive
 

After the shellacking that Ryan received at the mouth of Joe Biden, it’s amazing that anyone could seriously consider him a future PotUS candidate. He also was officially denied by the Catholic Church who publicly stated they have no idea where Ryan got his anti-poor support concepts that he attributed to the Catholic Church. How many politicians have been excommunicated by their avowed church?

Then, Ryan is leagues ahead of Sarah Plain, Michelle Bachwoman, Sanitorium and others – the crowd of hypocritical clowns.

Posted by ptiffany | Report as abusive
 

Has this fellow ever signed the front side of a paycheck? Or has he only endorsed the back?

Posted by ElmerDickweed | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •