Comments on: A new Paul Ryan? http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2013/10/11/a-new-paul-ryan/ Fri, 31 Jul 2015 03:37:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: ElmerDickweed http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2013/10/11/a-new-paul-ryan/#comment-3334 Sat, 26 Oct 2013 19:24:26 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/?p=2670#comment-3334 Has this fellow ever signed the front side of a paycheck? Or has he only endorsed the back?

]]>
By: ptiffany http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2013/10/11/a-new-paul-ryan/#comment-3284 Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:41:19 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/?p=2670#comment-3284 After the shellacking that Ryan received at the mouth of Joe Biden, it’s amazing that anyone could seriously consider him a future PotUS candidate. He also was officially denied by the Catholic Church who publicly stated they have no idea where Ryan got his anti-poor support concepts that he attributed to the Catholic Church. How many politicians have been excommunicated by their avowed church?

Then, Ryan is leagues ahead of Sarah Plain, Michelle Bachwoman, Sanitorium and others – the crowd of hypocritical clowns.

]]>
By: repubsrcrazy http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2013/10/11/a-new-paul-ryan/#comment-3282 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:33:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/?p=2670#comment-3282 Next fiscal year the deficit will be 2% of gdp or less. What deficit problem? the only deficit problem we have is the deficit of sensible governing from the right!

]]>
By: SanPa http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2013/10/11/a-new-paul-ryan/#comment-3281 Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:06:10 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/?p=2670#comment-3281 The Ryan approach has to be a no-go. It would mean extending credit by two more months … with uncertainty which provides no framework for planning capital outlays. Cut spending and / or raise taxes but end the Cheney-style waterboarding of financial planning.

]]>
By: jlj http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2013/10/11/a-new-paul-ryan/#comment-3280 Sat, 12 Oct 2013 03:23:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/?p=2670#comment-3280 I, too, disagree that the Tea Party is losing; unfortunately, the people who are “guiding” those whose fears have lead them to hate/distrust government, the federal government and Obama in particular, are in it for the long haul, and are sure that they can succeed with carefully (and often ridiculously) crafted congressional districts. This may not get a Republican in the White House, but it will keep the House of Representatives in the shape it is in today. UNLESS people such as Paul Ryan can show leadership and not just political savvy. I watched and listened to him on C-SPAN this evening, and when he wasn’t being cutesy, he made some very good points…

]]>
By: edgyinchina http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2013/10/11/a-new-paul-ryan/#comment-3279 Sat, 12 Oct 2013 00:08:22 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/?p=2670#comment-3279 David: I disagree on one major point you’re trying to make….
‘In short, the Tea Party is losing.’
Wrong… The tea party has been fairly smart in this aspect. They planned ahead…. well ahead. They carefully and methodically crafted congressional districts that would nearly guarantee a perpetual succession of Republican officeholders. Then, over time drove those districts further and further to the right. This is merely a culmination of a well thought out plan, inaugurated years ago. They have not lost… Unfortunately.

]]>