Reuters Blogs

Davos 2009

World Economic Forum

08:26 January 24th, 2008

Guilty until proven innocent?

Posted by: James Saft
Tags: Davos 2008

The morning session on sovereign funds pretty much boiled down to them saying, “Why regulate us when we’ve never yet done any of the things you are worried about?”

Mohamed Al-Jasser, vice governor of the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency, said that it was as if they were being presumed “guilty until proven innocent.” Bader Al Sa’ad, of the Kuwait Investment Authority said they’d been in business 55 years without any politically enforced decisions:

“All this fear about sovereign wealth funds has no real basis.”

Stephen Schwarzman, Chairman and CEO of Blackstone, was, as might be expected from someone with a substantial shareholder in the form of the Chinese, nearly lyrical in his praise.

“Our experience with sovereign wealth funds is they are smart, long term, highly professional. All they are looking for is higher rate of return.”

I cannot fail to point out that China took a 10 percent stake in Blackstone in May, paying $3 billion. Blackstone shares have more than halved since they went public in June.

A note of caution came from former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, who said there was cause for concern over political meddling in business.

He was also worried lest sovereign funds entrench bad management.


Get Video here

James Saft is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

One comment so far

[...] Sovereign Wealth Funds: Guilt until proven innocent? (Reuters) [...]

- Posted by Sovereign Wealth Funds ‘It’ Topic at 2008 World Economic Forum « ExcessLiquidity.org

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.