Cancun needs to be a key issue at Davos

By Guest Contributor
January 24, 2011

– Lord Julian Hunt is a Visiting Professor at Delft University, Vice-President of Globe, and former Director-General of the UK Met Office. The opinions expressed are his own –

CLIMATE/The environment has long been a key area of focus for delegates at the World Economic Forum.  This year will be no different with the gathering at Davos taking place only a month after the UN Climate Change Conference meeting in Cancun.

Far from being another unsuccessful international environmental meeting, as some predicted, the Cancun Summit is likely to be looked back upon in years to come as a seminal moment.  The accord endorsed the various actions of countries to limit green house gas emissions.  However, more significantly for the long term it accepted that preserving the global environment in its present state is probably unattainable.

The focus thus now moves to adaptation to deal with the more volatile climate that is predicted by all the major centres of climate science for the rest of this century and beyond.  This mammoth effort will necessitate enhanced cooperation from leaders across the public, private and third sectors, including many of those at Davos this week.

The exceptional seriousness of the global warming problem was underlined most recently by an International Energy Agency (IEA) report last November on the trend of increasing global emissions of green house gases.  Under the Copenhagen Accord’s environmental goals and pledges (as at the end of November), emissions would rise 21% above 2008 levels by 2035 alone; the emissions growth rate of China (now the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases) will increase at an even greater rate than this.

The IEA indicates that the increase in global temperature in these circumstances will be at least 3.5C.  There appears little that the incremental, non-legally binding Cancun accord (which builds upon Copenhagen) will do to alter this.  Indeed, opposition to the deal has centred around the fact that critics, including Bolivia, assert that it would result in a global temperature rise of more than 4C.

In the absence of moves towards a much stronger, global and legally binding deal, the world is thus on the path of the ‘business as usual’ scenario envisaged recently as an unlikely worst case.  And, the international community now has got to therefore consider unprecedented changes.

What is absolutely clear is that temperature rises of a 3-4C magnitude will, most likely, pose an irreversible tipping point for continental sized areas of changing land cover, and for ice on sea and land.  As a result, millions (if not tens of millions) of people are likely to be displaced by the effects of desertification and rising sea levels, and mountain snow melt.

In this fast moving and disturbing picture, international action must now focus with equal urgency on how societies can adapt to (as well as prevent) these changes.  And, with this in mind, politicians and the public would do well to follow the Netherlands Delta commission; the report of the UK Adaptation Sub-Committee of the Committee on Climate Change; and China’s scientific agencies and seriously begin to consider planning for the monumental changes that will be apparent in the decades to come.

Put simply, as extreme weather becomes more frequent, countries will need to develop integrated practical policies that deal both with the full range of climate change adaptation and natural disasters.  This year’s weather-related disasters, ranging from the brush fires in Russia to the floods in Pakistan, will only grow in frequency and we must be better prepared.

In this difficult context, how is the world responding?

Firstly, although the Kyoto accord will not be renewed in 2012, the (weaker and non-legally binding) Cancun deal that more than 190 countries have signed up to is nonetheless an important development.  Key measures include a Green Climate Fund intended to raise and disburse 100 billion dollars a year by 2020 to protect poor nations against climate impacts and assist them with low-carbon development; and a new Adaptation Committee will support countries as they establish climate protection plans.

While the Cancun accord has its weaknesses, it is much better than no deal at all.  And, we must be realistic: given the massively wide range of political, economic and technical approaches to climate change policy across the world, it may now be impossible to frame a much stronger international agreement that would satisfy all governments, businesses and civil society groups.

The second key trend is the development across the world of a wide diversity of approaches to tackling climate change at the local, regional and national levels.  In a Mexico City symposium, organised by Global Legislators for a Balanced Environment (Globe), I heard last month how collaboration in such ‘bottom up’ initiatives will be an essential part of the global effort to tackle the dangers of climate change, and should be part of the Cancun accord.

For instance, in China, where a feasibility study is being concluded right now into a new comprehensive climate change law, financial rewards for reducing energy use provided by regional government are making substantial improvements in efficiency.  These arrangements are evolving into local carbon markets, albeit small-scale and voluntary at this stage.

EU countries have been emphasising different kinds of low carbon energy, such as wind, carbon sequestration and nuclear power.  The continent has also promoted its policy of carbon trading to motivate industrial efficiency.  The EU and China are also planning to introduce new systems of monitoring green house gas emissions, using remote sensing and ground based instrumentation, in order to have a reliable regulatory/incentivisation scheme.

Other countries are focusing on preventing the rise of atmospheric greenhouse gases by expanding forestry.  For instance, Brazil and Mexico are introducing national legislation for minimising the loss of tropical rain forest and preserving these irreplaceable natural habitats, while ensuring the vitality of communities who live in them.  Modern technologies including satellite surveillance are ensuring that loss of rain forest can be slowed.

However, despite these initiatives, we are now at a point at which preserving our current environment is probably unobtainable.  What is thus urgently needed is broader agreement on a range of practical actions to mitigate climate change and deal with its effects on health, business, agriculture and natural disasters.

The rising costs of dealing with these effects, such as coastal defences, reducing desertification and urban overheating, mean that preventative actions have to begin right away.  It would be folly of the highest order to delay this process until economies grow further, as some influential economists continue to argue.

2 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

I live in Toronto Ontario and the temperature this AM is -20C, wind chill at -30C. The mercury hasn’t been above 0C since before Christmas, and there likely won’t be any break until after mid-February, and that’s the earliest. If this is global warming then I’d like to know what an Ice Age would be like.

Posted by Gotthardbahn | Report as abusive

The way to handle these extreme weather patterns is obviously demonstrated in Australia.

An extra general tax of limited duration to recompensate for the damage.

Posted by Motomat | Report as abusive