Aggression vs triumphalism

February 8, 2012

I watched two recent finals — The Australian Tennis Open (Djokovic vs. Nadal) and the Super Bowl (Giants vs. Patriots) and their endings were very different in spirit. I liked the Super Bowl ending better, surprisingly for me.

Tennis is a non-contact sport,  and even today you can’t foul your opponent. But when Djokovic won a close very exciting game filled with reversals, he went literally ape — snarled, looked up at the sky, roared several times with bared teeth, tore off his shirt, flexed his muscles.

Intimidating to the other apes, though the game was already over.

I understand being happy about winning, and aggression is necessary to do so, but I dislike this kind of triumphalist gloating. Personally, Borg and the other Swedes were my stylistic heroes, plus Sampras and Federer. Still, no one gets hurt and it’s not violent.

The Super Bowl was diametrically opposite. The game was filled with aggression and violence in the cause of getting the ball into the end zone. But when someone got a touchdown they spiked the ball and did a dance of joy, not triumph. And when the Giants finally won, they didn’t roar, they didn’t trample, they didn’t gloat. They merely looked genuinely happy.

Strange that tennis brings out the worst at the end, and football the best.

PHOTOS: Novak Djokovic of Serbia celebrates after defeating Rafael Nadal of Spain in their men’s singles final match at the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne January 30, 2012. REUTERS/Ryan Pierse/Pool. New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning raises the Vince Lombardi Trophy after defeating the New England Patriots to win the NFL Super Bowl XLVI football game in Indianapolis, Indiana, February 5, 2012. REUTERS/Matt Sullivan


One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

I’m a hack tennis player (3.0/3.5 on a good day).

Yet I’ve too often been shocked – SHOCKED – by how transparently upstanding guys (equally mediocre at tennis) would engage in unseemly behavior while playing me – either blatant cheating or behaving ridiculously with false machismo. Trust me, no match that ever involved me was worth either cheating for or boasting about.

With that as a frame of reference, I guess I don’t regard Djokovic’s behavior as all that demonstrative. After all it was the longest Grand Slam final in history, no? I was just impressed he still had that much energy to disrobe and yell.

Posted by Anichini | Report as abusive