<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are biofuels really &#8220;green&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/11/02/are-biofuels-really-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/11/02/are-biofuels-really-green/</link>
	<description>Global environmental challenges</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Biofuels: Good or Bad?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/11/02/are-biofuels-really-green/#comment-334798</link>
		<dc:creator>Biofuels: Good or Bad?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/11/02/are-biofuels-really-green/#comment-334798</guid>
		<description>[...] (Source)(Source)(Source)(Source)   This entry was posted on Thursday, May 1st, 2008 at 8:32 am and is filed under Biofuels. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or TrackBack URI from your own site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Source)(Source)(Source)(Source)   This entry was posted on Thursday, May 1st, 2008 at 8:32 am and is filed under Biofuels. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or TrackBack URI from your own site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Oleen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/11/02/are-biofuels-really-green/#comment-332075</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Oleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/11/02/are-biofuels-really-green/#comment-332075</guid>
		<description>"Biofuels" are "green" only to the extent that they cost less energy to manufacture than they generate when burnt - whether it be in a boiler or diesel engine or whatever.  If, as I believe is generally the case, other fuels, such as natural gas, petroleum-based fuels, or coal need to be used in the manufacturing process, then they cannot be said to be "green".

It is the process of releasing carbon which has been sequestered for millions of years, and which is, upon being burnt, increasing the partial pressure of CO2 level in the atmosphere that is causing global warming.

There is an additional cost associated with biofuels, and that is the depletion of nutrients in the soil in which they are grown.  A typical nutrient cycle - one undisturbed by man - is such that grass grows, is eaten by buffalo and other herbivores (for example) which then die, either of old age or predation, and return their bodies to the soil of the area in which they lived, either directly or by passing through the system of a preditor or preditors, which, in turn die...

When humans interrupt this cycle, it becomes necessary to replenish the soil with fertilizer.  The energy costs of manufacturing the fertilizer and then tranporting and distributing it much be accounted for when trying to determine if a "biofuel" is "green".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Biofuels&#8221; are &#8220;green&#8221; only to the extent that they cost less energy to manufacture than they generate when burnt - whether it be in a boiler or diesel engine or whatever.  If, as I believe is generally the case, other fuels, such as natural gas, petroleum-based fuels, or coal need to be used in the manufacturing process, then they cannot be said to be &#8220;green&#8221;.</p>
<p>It is the process of releasing carbon which has been sequestered for millions of years, and which is, upon being burnt, increasing the partial pressure of CO2 level in the atmosphere that is causing global warming.</p>
<p>There is an additional cost associated with biofuels, and that is the depletion of nutrients in the soil in which they are grown.  A typical nutrient cycle - one undisturbed by man - is such that grass grows, is eaten by buffalo and other herbivores (for example) which then die, either of old age or predation, and return their bodies to the soil of the area in which they lived, either directly or by passing through the system of a preditor or preditors, which, in turn die&#8230;</p>
<p>When humans interrupt this cycle, it becomes necessary to replenish the soil with fertilizer.  The energy costs of manufacturing the fertilizer and then tranporting and distributing it much be accounted for when trying to determine if a &#8220;biofuel&#8221; is &#8220;green&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
