Climate change is a threat, we must all work together but we can’t let it affect economic growth or the ambitions of hundreds of millions of impoverished people to live better lives.
That was basically the message from some of the world’s top polluters on Wednesday after they signed a regional climate declaration, less than two weeks before a major U.N.-sponsored meeting on global warming in Bali.
The pact contained no fixed targets on cutting emissions or limiting their growth by a specific date but did pledge to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the long run. As pacts go, this one is pretty vague.
“Climate change has to be addressed — but they cannot leave people in absolute poverty,” Singapore’s Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said after the negotiations involving 16 nations in the city state.
The pact involved the leaders of the East Asia Summit, which comprises 10 South East Asian countries, plus six other nations. These include China, India and Japan, among the world’s top polluters, and Australia, a major coal exporter.
“Efforts to fight climate change should promote, not block, economic development,” China’s Premier Wen Jiabao told the summit.
The problem is that many scientist and the United Nations say Asia will be among the regions hardest-hit by climate change.
More extreme weather, such as intense storms and prolonged droughts, rising seas and melting glaciers are expected to cause widespread damage, affect food and water supplies and create millions of refugees.
For Asia, and indeed the rest of the world, climate change has truly become the classic chicken-and-egg situation. Do you reform your economies and prepare your populations now or do you go for growth and deal with the problem in earnest when it really becomes a crisis?
While many Asian nations are working to trim emissions and become more energy efficient, these steps aren’t matching the pace of economic development. China says it needs an extra one million kilometres (600,000 miles) of roads by 2020 and says rich nations should take the lead in cutting emissions during negotiations to be launched in Bali.
While developed nations should do more to fight climate change, what should fast-growing Asian nations do now before the costs of climate change become too great to ignore?

Trackback
4 comments so far
That the human species should face wanton neglect in the name of progress, reflects the true character of present day leaders.
They also fail to realise that sociological, ecological, as well as economical evolutionary rates of progression will slow to a stand-still. Based upon a model where nature, and the universal definition of life are unable to partake of a healthy and purposeful existence.
Meagre men of modern times, accompanied by meagre minds - the lot of them.
- Posted by William D. JacksonIts an untold promise to todays children that we do something now and not wait. Simply, if we see a problem, we must try to fix it.
- Posted by StephenPropaganda ‘science’ has been happening more and more; the scientific basis for banning DDT is missing! Millions have died from malaria. Last year the WHO lifted the ban… too bad for the millions of people already dead.
Propaganda junk science led the USSR to develop the dangerous Chernobyl reactor and the reactors for their nuclear submarine fleet as well. A political hack insisted their science was so superior to the capitalist west that cooling and containment were unnecessary. Now I guess Gore has lowered us to the USSR standard.
The most important information you can have is that CO2 has a property called retrograde solubility. Unlike most substances, it dissolves in cold water rather than hot. As earth heats by natural causes, CO2 is released from the slightly warmer ocean and if earth’s oceans cool CO2 goes into solution. Shake up a warm beer if you don’t believe me. CO2 trails natural warming.
I guess what I am getting to is that the polarization of society between arts and engineering has left the arts side of the population vulnerable to big expensive scams, and propaganda. No one doubts that the climate changes. It always has and always will. Relax the planet is fine. Fortunately the UN IPCC report is being criticised by real scientist insoide and outside. Beliefs are not enough! “Seems like” is not a scientific term.
Fran Manns
- Posted by Dr. Francis T. Manns. P.Geo. (Ontario)So Doc, could you tell me, what are those “natural causes” for the warming?
Specially the ones that justify fast and extreme changes in the last years. Is there any catastrophic event I missed?
So you advocate relaxation, burning fossil fuel to exhaustion, inefficient use of energy, cutting our forests…
Well, let’s look at another “scientific” approach to the problem, assuming the cause is Natural Warming, and that atmospheric CO2 as a greenhouse effect (can I assume this last one? Please, please, please!!!):
NATURAL WARMING = MORE CO2 REALEASED FROM OCEANS =
= MORE WARMING + HUMAN ACTIVITY CO2 (NOT SINKING IN WARMER OCEANS) =
= MORE WARMING =
= MORE CO2 REALEASED FROM OCEANS + LESS CO2 SINKING IN WARMER OCEANS + LESS CO2 SINKING IN CUT FORESTS =
= MORE CO2 =
= MORE WARMING…
Hummm, strange, it all adds to a pretty chaotic spiral.
I’d love to read your late opinions on the ozone lair!!
Can you send me a scientist diploma now???
Relax, but with a clear conscience.
Ricardo
- Posted by ricardo