<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How green is your Web site?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/</link>
	<description>Global environmental challenges</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danicka</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-334558</link>
		<dc:creator>Danicka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-334558</guid>
		<description>"100 billion pounds of carbon dioxide emissions annuall". OMG that is so much ! But i think that thanks to Internet pretty much tree has been saved ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;100 billion pounds of carbon dioxide emissions annuall&#8221;. OMG that is so much ! But i think that thanks to Internet pretty much tree has been saved &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-333418</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-333418</guid>
		<description>I don't know. But I don't use a lot of paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. But I don&#8217;t use a lot of paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickkrogers.com goes carbon-neutral - nickkrogers.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-333043</link>
		<dc:creator>nickkrogers.com goes carbon-neutral - nickkrogers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-333043</guid>
		<description>[...] do the rest for me. You can do it too! Make your page carbon neutral. For more info, check out this article. For now they are picking up the tab themselves, but looking for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do the rest for me. You can do it too! Make your page carbon neutral. For more info, check out this article. For now they are picking up the tab themselves, but looking for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-333042</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-333042</guid>
		<description>I'm using it at my site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using it at my site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332906</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332906</guid>
		<description>You may also be interested in the Carbon Neutral Search engine, recently launched in october, which offsets a minimum of 100g of CO2 for each and every search, covering the 17.57g of CO2 emitted from the search query and the computer use of the searcher ...

http://www.carbonneutralsearch.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may also be interested in the Carbon Neutral Search engine, recently launched in october, which offsets a minimum of 100g of CO2 for each and every search, covering the 17.57g of CO2 emitted from the search query and the computer use of the searcher &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.carbonneutralsearch.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.carbonneutralsearch.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kishimoto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332671</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kishimoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332671</guid>
		<description>Some web hosts, such as the one I use, already promote carbon-neutrality as among the features of their accounts:

http://www.dreamhost.com/aboutus-green.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some web hosts, such as the one I use, already promote carbon-neutrality as among the features of their accounts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dreamhost.com/aboutus-green.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dreamhost.com/aboutus-green.h tml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jobe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332447</link>
		<dc:creator>Jobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332447</guid>
		<description>If the numbers are correct: 100 billion pounds is equivalent to 50 million tons for internet use alone.  At current average offset rates ($13.50 per ton) that's $675 million dollars if they succeed on putting it on everyone's website.  That kind of change should make a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the numbers are correct: 100 billion pounds is equivalent to 50 million tons for internet use alone.  At current average offset rates ($13.50 per ton) that&#8217;s $675 million dollars if they succeed on putting it on everyone&#8217;s website.  That kind of change should make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bambang Prastowo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332442</link>
		<dc:creator>Bambang Prastowo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2007/12/03/how-green-is-your-web-site/#comment-332442</guid>
		<description>I don't get it. You are comparing 100 billion pounds (Internet emissions) and 2.79 billion tons (US power plants) which are 20 times heavier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. You are comparing 100 billion pounds (Internet emissions) and 2.79 billion tons (US power plants) which are 20 times heavier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
