Reuters Blogs

Environment

Global environmental challenges

09:58 February 15th, 2008

Can soccer clubs axe energy use? Chilly Rosenborg cuts lights, heating

Posted by: Alister Doyle
Tags: Environment

Martin Jorgensen (L) of Fiorentina fights for the ball with Rosenborg Trondheim’s Roar Strand during their UEFA Cup third round soccer match at Lerkendal stadium in Trondheim, Norway, February 14, 2008.    The floodlights at Rosenborg Trondheim soccer club are blazing less often, the costly under-pitch heating to keep frost at bay is being used more sparingly, and winger Michael Jamtfall has taken to driving an electric car.

    The Norwegian team may not be doing brilliantly in Europe — Rosenborg lost 0-1 at home to Fiorentina on Thursday in the UEFA Cup — but they are making big energy savings in a drive to cut costs, and emissions of greenhouse gases.

    Rosenborg say they will axe their annual energy use by the equivalent of the electricity used by over 40 average Norwegian homes — I had no idea that a sports club with about 90 employees, including players, could save so much energy (…or burn through so much in the first place).

    The club has invested about $40,000 in measures to save energy, and will earn that back in less than half a year, said Arne Melan, technical expert at the club. “We’re trying to change people’s attitudes,” he said.Workers clear snow from the pitch at Lerkendal Stadium in Trondheim, Central Norway, November 27, 2007. Rosenborg will take on Chelsea at this stadium for a Champions League match Wednesday evening.

      The heating and ventilation systems have been overhauled so that they are only on during office hours, saving huge amounts of energy (Many Norwegians keep the heating on round the clock, fearing that it will be impossible to warm up again on bone-chilling winter days).

 Shower heads in the changing rooms have been modified to save water and insulation has been put around water pipes. Under-pitch heating — helping keep the grass alive through the winter and avoiding a dangerous rock-solid surface — is being used less. 

    “The floodlights at the training ground often used to be on all evening…even if no one was training. Now we have a computer programme that turns them on only when players are there,” Melan said.

   So how far is your sports club cutting back on energy waste and greenhouse gas emissions?

   

4 comments so far

[...] - are making serious efforts to go green and are hoping other teams will follow. They’ve just spent $40,000 to make the club more energy efficient, money they expect to earn back in about half a year’s [...]

- Posted by Rosenberg Tackle Global Warming - World Football - The Offside - Soccer News and Opinion from leagues around the world

I wonder how much energy the club uses on transportation. Especially, considering that Rosenborg is a top European club.

- Posted by JohnWS

Good point on the energy used for transport — the accounting didn’t mention it…they probably fly further than most soccer teams from the northern fringe of Europe (…though they’re ’saving’ emissions now since they’ve been knocked out of the UEFA Cup).
One climate friendly story I remember is that they went to training before a Champions League game at Arsenal from their hotel by the London underground. How many top flight European clubs make their stars use public transport?

- Posted by Alister Doyle

Good point! In fact teams shouldn’t use any transport at all, and should be restricted to only playing during the day with dynamo’s strapped to thier leggs so they are providing a clean source of energy. No longer shall the carbon footprint of oppression have footie studs on the bottom of it!

- Posted by McShabby

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.