<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nike wins, restaurants lose on list of climate-friendly companies</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2008/05/07/nike-wins-restaurants-lose-on-list-of-climate-friendly-companies/</link>
	<description>Global environmental challenges</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stjepan Skramic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2008/05/07/nike-wins-restaurants-lose-on-list-of-climate-friendly-companies/#comment-334854</link>
		<dc:creator>Stjepan Skramic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2008/05/07/nike-wins-restaurants-lose-on-list-of-climate-friendly-companies/#comment-334854</guid>
		<description>Climate Counts' report is not to be trusted. The methodology is all wrong:  http://www.poandpo.com/business-as-usual/how-climate-counts-got-it-all-wrong/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate Counts&#8217; report is not to be trusted. The methodology is all wrong:  <a href="http://www.poandpo.com/business-as-usual/how-climate-counts-got-it-all-wrong/" rel="nofollow">http://www.poandpo.com/business-as-usual &nbsp;/how-climate-counts-got-it-all-wrong/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
