Should climate sinners face World Cup ban?
June 2-13 talks in Bonn on a new deal to widen the Kyoto Protocol after a first period ends in 2012 are ending on Friday with few agreements and many criticisms about a lack of progress.
But how do you focus delegations’ minds and get countries to do more to curb greenhouse gas emissions? U.N. reports last year warning the world of rising temperatures, droughts, rising seas and other risks in coming decades have not fully done the trick.
Sanctions under the Kyoto Protocol, the main existing plan for fighting climate change running to 2012, involve imposing stiffer greenhoues cuts in a next period. But does that do the job?
Rarely for a U.N. climate meeting, the Bonn sessions have often ended promptly at about 6 p.m. — and some delegates have been more agitated talking about the Euro 2008 soccer than about the threats to the planet.
So Alden Meyer, of the Union of Concerned Scientists, has a joking proposal: “if countries don’t comply their teams shouldn’t be allowed to go to the World Cup.”
What do you think?