Comments on: Air pollution permits back on track in Southern California http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/13/air-pollution-permits-back-on-track-in-southern-california/ Global environmental challenges Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:14:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: daggie1234 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/13/air-pollution-permits-back-on-track-in-southern-california/comment-page-1/#comment-346810 Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:18:25 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14260#comment-346810 to me it seems that under the current economical conditions it’s not unthinkable that Schwarzenegger gives priority to boosting the market over protecting the environment.
Still, I believe that in the end protecting our environment and maintaining clean air is of more importance than the economy

]]>
By: Peter Dousma http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/13/air-pollution-permits-back-on-track-in-southern-california/comment-page-1/#comment-342336 Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:32:15 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14260#comment-342336 Sincere Reuters.com,

My comment on the renewal of air-quality permits in southern California is two fold. First if permits are issued it is important to limit the exhaust of toxins well below the levels considered safe. The toxins might end up in the environment and partly in the ground water. Secondly if the prevailing air circulation is south or southwest the exhaust will pass dense populated urban areas. This might prove to be problematic and cause smog at days without sufficient air circulation

With regards,
Peter Dousma

]]>