<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copenhagen&#8230;DOpenHAgen&#8230;DOHA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/</link>
	<description>Global environmental challenges</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: p raja</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/comment-page-1/#comment-343170</link>
		<dc:creator>p raja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14397#comment-343170</guid>
		<description>global warming is a UN political agenda, with them playing doomstay scenario. Did you see UK scientists getting caught fudging climate data to prove warming when there was none.

IPCC needs to release their data sets, analysis in the open for other scientists to review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>global warming is a UN political agenda, with them playing doomstay scenario. Did you see UK scientists getting caught fudging climate data to prove warming when there was none.</p>
<p>IPCC needs to release their data sets, analysis in the open for other scientists to review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/comment-page-1/#comment-342710</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14397#comment-342710</guid>
		<description>What power grab? What global government? What discredited science?

Is there more power grab than having the world under the rule of oil?

Is there more global government, than having everybody pumping gas at prices controled by few, rather than have every country harvesting solar, wind, hidric, biofuels, etc, with their own resources?

&quot;Discredited science? Do you all feel that arrogant that we humans can change the climate?&quot;
Are you kidding me??? What are your science sources? 

We cannot only change the climate, we have done it for decades!

6 billions of humans pumping tons and tons of CO2 and other gases, cutting forests -- no IMPACT?!?!?!
Ever heard of acid rain? Ever heard of the ozone layer hole? Ever heard the island effect in bug cities?

You make me laugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What power grab? What global government? What discredited science?</p>
<p>Is there more power grab than having the world under the rule of oil?</p>
<p>Is there more global government, than having everybody pumping gas at prices controled by few, rather than have every country harvesting solar, wind, hidric, biofuels, etc, with their own resources?</p>
<p>&#8220;Discredited science? Do you all feel that arrogant that we humans can change the climate?&#8221;<br />
Are you kidding me??? What are your science sources? </p>
<p>We cannot only change the climate, we have done it for decades!</p>
<p>6 billions of humans pumping tons and tons of CO2 and other gases, cutting forests &#8212; no IMPACT?!?!?!<br />
Ever heard of acid rain? Ever heard of the ozone layer hole? Ever heard the island effect in bug cities?</p>
<p>You make me laugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cable</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/comment-page-1/#comment-342594</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14397#comment-342594</guid>
		<description>Lets hope that world leaders will acknowledge climate science of the past couple of years showing climate change 98% due to changes in solar output.  This being confirmed by actual temp data and not incomplete and inaccurate computer models.

Likely they will loose any remaining credibility and ignore most current science and continue with their power and money grab under the disguise of global warming/climate change.

Even using their outdated computer modeling the solutions proposed to their made up crisis would not make any difference in temperature rise using their own discredited science.

Of course they would let facts and reality get in the way of their arrogant power grab.
 
All free people around the world should reject the proposed climate treaty for what it is an attempt to create a flawed world government where free men and women are subservient to unelected and unaccountable UN bureaucrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets hope that world leaders will acknowledge climate science of the past couple of years showing climate change 98% due to changes in solar output.  This being confirmed by actual temp data and not incomplete and inaccurate computer models.</p>
<p>Likely they will loose any remaining credibility and ignore most current science and continue with their power and money grab under the disguise of global warming/climate change.</p>
<p>Even using their outdated computer modeling the solutions proposed to their made up crisis would not make any difference in temperature rise using their own discredited science.</p>
<p>Of course they would let facts and reality get in the way of their arrogant power grab.</p>
<p>All free people around the world should reject the proposed climate treaty for what it is an attempt to create a flawed world government where free men and women are subservient to unelected and unaccountable UN bureaucrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/comment-page-1/#comment-342592</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14397#comment-342592</guid>
		<description>Why have so many people become &quot;sheeple&quot;?
You all should be questioning this stuff.
The worst 9 words you can hear are:
&quot;I&#039;m from the government, I have come to help&quot;.
Doesn&#039;t anyone believe that if you only hear one side of an argument that that in itself should send up a red flag. It&#039;s not about the enviroment, it&#039;s about money and power and one world government. Do you all feel that arrogant that we humans can change the climate????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why have so many people become &#8220;sheeple&#8221;?<br />
You all should be questioning this stuff.<br />
The worst 9 words you can hear are:<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m from the government, I have come to help&#8221;.<br />
Doesn&#8217;t anyone believe that if you only hear one side of an argument that that in itself should send up a red flag. It&#8217;s not about the enviroment, it&#8217;s about money and power and one world government. Do you all feel that arrogant that we humans can change the climate????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asiya Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/comment-page-1/#comment-342588</link>
		<dc:creator>Asiya Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14397#comment-342588</guid>
		<description>The leaders that will be meeting to seal the deal MUST have one agenda ONLY and that is to takea decision to effectively make changes that will be for the betterment of humanity and the planet...No Hidden Agenda&#039;s PLEASE, no more double dealing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leaders that will be meeting to seal the deal MUST have one agenda ONLY and that is to takea decision to effectively make changes that will be for the betterment of humanity and the planet&#8230;No Hidden Agenda&#8217;s PLEASE, no more double dealing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estelle Rouhaud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/10/22/copenhagendopenhagendoha/comment-page-1/#comment-342587</link>
		<dc:creator>Estelle Rouhaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14397#comment-342587</guid>
		<description>Without despising the importance of the Doha Round for the world, we can all hope leaders in Copenhagen won&#039;t make the same mistakes as in Doha, and this for one main reason: what is at stake this time (climate change, our planet at risk, ourselves at risk) is far more vital than the international trade negotiations. Our survival depends on it and hopefully, this will make the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without despising the importance of the Doha Round for the world, we can all hope leaders in Copenhagen won&#8217;t make the same mistakes as in Doha, and this for one main reason: what is at stake this time (climate change, our planet at risk, ourselves at risk) is far more vital than the international trade negotiations. Our survival depends on it and hopefully, this will make the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
