Comments on: Trade lessons for climate negotiators http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/11/16/trade-lessons-for-climate-negotiators/ Global environmental challenges Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:14:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Anubis http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/11/16/trade-lessons-for-climate-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-343144 Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:37:17 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14614#comment-343144 It is unfortunate that negotiations are required for nations to act to save the planet. The world is still reeling from the broken down negotiations in Paris 1919(Treaty of Versialle). I hope the “climate negotiators” exercise logic and not emotion. The consequences of flawed negotiations and another ineffective climate accord will prove to be calamitous for humanity.

]]>
By: scheng1 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/11/16/trade-lessons-for-climate-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-343140 Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:55:28 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14614#comment-343140 It boils down to money. If there is a way to make solar-powered car at 30% of the normal car, every country will go for it.There is no need to argue who emits more greenhouse gases.Instead of discussing about cutting down on greenhouse gases emission, a more constructive way is to discuss about research into clean energy.

]]>
By: Richard http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/11/16/trade-lessons-for-climate-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-343069 Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:03:43 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14614#comment-343069 Trade lessons you say. NOT true and wrong. what is required is Engineering Lessons.And Big Business lessons. The first cars(Robots)ran on alcohol moonshine .OR wood Gas or marijana oil. ALL was CARBON Neutral. BUT that was made illegal by Puppet Rulers and only PETROL was Legal from BIG companies. Do not let the Fox fix the problems.

]]>
By: Terry Edmonds http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/11/16/trade-lessons-for-climate-negotiators/comment-page-1/#comment-343033 Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:47:46 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14614#comment-343033 I really regret China holding on a position that if you USA as a developed nation had polluted the atmosphere for past 50 years or so, then we China should be allowed to do same for say another 30 years before we sit down and set concrete targets for future. The world has time differences, but not the environment.

]]>