Comments on: Climate experts on Copenhagen

By: climscam

climscam — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:42:41 +0000

hello from evil alberta. waking up to a warm -40 degrees C
so much for cilmate change.

By: eddieblack

eddieblack — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:33:15 +0000

Persch, there is no legitimate proof that global warming is a hoax. I know of a handful of climate and atmospheric scientists that dispute global warming and climate change. The only way one can prove a cause of death is for the patient to die. Who will be the coroner for humanity should we all die?

The argument as to anthropogenic or natural causes for climate change is moot. If the Earth is releasing methane and CO2 which warm the planet, then how are we helping matters by introducing more CO2 into the atmosphere?

Anubis was right, “Only fools debate the cause of a fire while it rages”.

By: Rainbear

Rainbear — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:14:09 +0000

If CO2 is really the reason causing global warming, why is there a serious consideration for nuclear power plant as alternative? Nuc is actually much more sophisticated tech than any other CO2 reduction TECH have invented and introduced, the most important thing is that it does not sacrifice economic development as a shift price.

By: DavidG

DavidG — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:28:16 +0000

I hope that Bjorn Lomborg is going to be speaking at the conference, as his rational approach to spending the world’s limited resources for the greatest good is seriously needed to counterbalance the wastful and potentially disasterous steps being proposed by most of the climate change gurus.

By: persch

persch — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:14:53 +0000

Considering the large number of qualilfied scientists who have ample and legitimate proof that the warming cycle is not induced in any large fashion by human activity why are their findings ingnored and instead we have the mad rush to drastically change the industrialized world’s economies, endangering the lives of millions of people? Wouldn’t small, incremental steps to imrpove things like air waulity be smarter than to throw out the baby with the bath water until a concensus can be reached? Science shoudl not be skewed in favor of plitical agendas.

By: Tarrooq

Tarrooq — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:36:02 +0000

My question: If all coal-based electricity producing plants are made free-GHG facilities, will we still have globle warming & climate change?.. if this is feasible, howmany decades we would have to live with 2C degree limit?

Tariq Albetairi
Dammam, Saudi Arabia
tariq.albetairi@gmail.com