Comments on: Climate experts on Copenhagen http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/12/04/climate-experts-on-copenhagen/ Global environmental challenges Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:14:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: climscam http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/12/04/climate-experts-on-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-343696 Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:42:41 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14881#comment-343696 hello from evil alberta. waking up to a warm -40 degrees C
so much for cilmate change.

]]>
By: eddieblack http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/12/04/climate-experts-on-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-343609 Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:33:15 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14881#comment-343609 Persch, there is no legitimate proof that global warming is a hoax. I know of a handful of climate and atmospheric scientists that dispute global warming and climate change. The only way one can prove a cause of death is for the patient to die. Who will be the coroner for humanity should we all die?

The argument as to anthropogenic or natural causes for climate change is moot. If the Earth is releasing methane and CO2 which warm the planet, then how are we helping matters by introducing more CO2 into the atmosphere?

Anubis was right, “Only fools debate the cause of a fire while it rages”.

]]>
By: Rainbear http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/12/04/climate-experts-on-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-343589 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:14:09 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14881#comment-343589 If CO2 is really the reason causing global warming, why is there a serious consideration for nuclear power plant as alternative? Nuc is actually much more sophisticated tech than any other CO2 reduction TECH have invented and introduced, the most important thing is that it does not sacrifice economic development as a shift price.

]]>
By: DavidG http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/12/04/climate-experts-on-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-343588 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:28:16 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14881#comment-343588 I hope that Bjorn Lomborg is going to be speaking at the conference, as his rational approach to spending the world’s limited resources for the greatest good is seriously needed to counterbalance the wastful and potentially disasterous steps being proposed by most of the climate change gurus.

]]>
By: persch http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/12/04/climate-experts-on-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-343586 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:14:53 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14881#comment-343586 Considering the large number of qualilfied scientists who have ample and legitimate proof that the warming cycle is not induced in any large fashion by human activity why are their findings ingnored and instead we have the mad rush to drastically change the industrialized world’s economies, endangering the lives of millions of people? Wouldn’t small, incremental steps to imrpove things like air waulity be smarter than to throw out the baby with the bath water until a concensus can be reached? Science shoudl not be skewed in favor of plitical agendas.

]]>
By: Tarrooq http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/12/04/climate-experts-on-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-343565 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:36:02 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=14881#comment-343565 My question: If all coal-based electricity producing plants are made free-GHG facilities, will we still have globle warming & climate change?.. if this is feasible, howmany decades we would have to live with 2C degree limit?

Tariq Albetairi
Dammam, Saudi Arabia
tariq.albetairi@gmail.com

]]>