<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel-backed SpectraWatt to close New York solar factory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2010/12/24/intel-backed-spectrawatt-to-close-new-york-solar-factory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2010/12/24/intel-backed-spectrawatt-to-close-new-york-solar-factory/</link>
	<description>Global environmental challenges</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fnl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2010/12/24/intel-backed-spectrawatt-to-close-new-york-solar-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-348387</link>
		<dc:creator>fnl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=19374#comment-348387</guid>
		<description>The funny thing is the lesson being drawn from this.  Folks are saying we should level the playing field with PRC&#039;s terrible centralized planning investment decisions by making equal/greater terrible centralized planning investment decisions.  If the Chinese want to invest in a non-commercially viable business, I would say we&#039;d be better off taking advantage of their subsidizing the business and devote our resources elsewhere.  Devoting our resources elsewhere is better done by the private sector, which rotates capital far more quickly than the government.  Less government will equal greater jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is the lesson being drawn from this.  Folks are saying we should level the playing field with PRC&#8217;s terrible centralized planning investment decisions by making equal/greater terrible centralized planning investment decisions.  If the Chinese want to invest in a non-commercially viable business, I would say we&#8217;d be better off taking advantage of their subsidizing the business and devote our resources elsewhere.  Devoting our resources elsewhere is better done by the private sector, which rotates capital far more quickly than the government.  Less government will equal greater jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magnets</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2010/12/24/intel-backed-spectrawatt-to-close-new-york-solar-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-347615</link>
		<dc:creator>magnets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=19374#comment-347615</guid>
		<description>The USA needs to get back in the game (rather than &#039;the&#039;, let&#039;s say &#039;a&#039; game).  Read about the Minerva Medica project in the book &#039;Getting Back To The American Dream&#039;.

Better read it before the Chinese win the health care game too.  Too bad Obamacare was about &#039;wealth transfer&#039; rather than fixing medical problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USA needs to get back in the game (rather than &#8216;the&#8217;, let&#8217;s say &#8216;a&#8217; game).  Read about the Minerva Medica project in the book &#8216;Getting Back To The American Dream&#8217;.</p>
<p>Better read it before the Chinese win the health care game too.  Too bad Obamacare was about &#8216;wealth transfer&#8217; rather than fixing medical problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prabhud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2010/12/24/intel-backed-spectrawatt-to-close-new-york-solar-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-347536</link>
		<dc:creator>prabhud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=19374#comment-347536</guid>
		<description>One option for SpectraWatt is to shift to India and compete with China. If they need to interact contact me psdeodhar@aplab.com More on me at www.psdeodhar.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One option for SpectraWatt is to shift to India and compete with China. If they need to interact contact me psdeodhar@aplab.com More on me at <a href='http://www.psdeodhar.net'>http://www.psdeodhar.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LEEDAP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2010/12/24/intel-backed-spectrawatt-to-close-new-york-solar-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-347472</link>
		<dc:creator>LEEDAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=19374#comment-347472</guid>
		<description>Wow. Once again China outperforms the US competition. Also investigate battery technology and production. The only way the US can compete is if the playing field is leveled. That means greater investment by the Government and a long-term, National program to support industry in a cooperative approach rather than a competitive one. China is mastering the centrally controlled free market. This is something the US did well in the 1950&#039;s after WWII. Many cooperative programs between the National Laboratories and industry produced jobs and consumer products that benefited workers, consumers, and society. Hopefully we&#039;ll relearn this from China&#039;s success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Once again China outperforms the US competition. Also investigate battery technology and production. The only way the US can compete is if the playing field is leveled. That means greater investment by the Government and a long-term, National program to support industry in a cooperative approach rather than a competitive one. China is mastering the centrally controlled free market. This is something the US did well in the 1950&#8242;s after WWII. Many cooperative programs between the National Laboratories and industry produced jobs and consumer products that benefited workers, consumers, and society. Hopefully we&#8217;ll relearn this from China&#8217;s success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
