<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many politicians does it take to NOT change a light bulb?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2011/07/13/how-many-politicians-does-it-take-to-not-change-a-light-bulb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2011/07/13/how-many-politicians-does-it-take-to-not-change-a-light-bulb/</link>
	<description>Global environmental challenges</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterdub</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2011/07/13/how-many-politicians-does-it-take-to-not-change-a-light-bulb/comment-page-1/#comment-348717</link>
		<dc:creator>peterdub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=19977#comment-348717</guid>
		<description>RE  How many politicians does it take to NOT change a light bulb?

Rather:
How many politicians or bureaucrats should it take to change a light bulb?
None.

How many citizens should be allowed to choose?
Everyone.

The 45 lumen per Watt end-regulation DOES BAN all known general service incandescents, including touted halogens (that only reach around 25 lumens per W) 
A simple cheap effective technology to produce bright broad spectrum light is thereby destroyed.

Besides,
apart from affecting people&#039;s product choice,
the actual switchover savings are not that great anyway =
less than 1% of overall energy use, and 1-2% grid electricity is saved, as shown by USA Dept of Energy, EU statistics and other official information
http://ceolas.net/#li171x
with alternative and more meaningful ways to save energy in generation, grid distribution or consumption.

Light bulbs don&#039;t burn coal or release CO2.
Power plants might.
If there&#039;s a problem - deal with the problem,
rather than a token ban on simple safe light bulbs,
light bulbs that people obviously like to use
(or there would not be a &quot;need&quot; to ban them)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE  How many politicians does it take to NOT change a light bulb?</p>
<p>Rather:<br />
How many politicians or bureaucrats should it take to change a light bulb?<br />
None.</p>
<p>How many citizens should be allowed to choose?<br />
Everyone.</p>
<p>The 45 lumen per Watt end-regulation DOES BAN all known general service incandescents, including touted halogens (that only reach around 25 lumens per W)<br />
A simple cheap effective technology to produce bright broad spectrum light is thereby destroyed.</p>
<p>Besides,<br />
apart from affecting people&#8217;s product choice,<br />
the actual switchover savings are not that great anyway =<br />
less than 1% of overall energy use, and 1-2% grid electricity is saved, as shown by USA Dept of Energy, EU statistics and other official information<br />
<a href='http://ceolas.net/#li171x'>http://ceolas.net/#li171x</a><br />
with alternative and more meaningful ways to save energy in generation, grid distribution or consumption.</p>
<p>Light bulbs don&#8217;t burn coal or release CO2.<br />
Power plants might.<br />
If there&#8217;s a problem &#8211; deal with the problem,<br />
rather than a token ban on simple safe light bulbs,<br />
light bulbs that people obviously like to use<br />
(or there would not be a &#8220;need&#8221; to ban them)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyotle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2011/07/13/how-many-politicians-does-it-take-to-not-change-a-light-bulb/comment-page-1/#comment-348174</link>
		<dc:creator>coyotle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=19977#comment-348174</guid>
		<description>The Grande Old Party is for sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Grande Old Party is for sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCantBeSerious</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2011/07/13/how-many-politicians-does-it-take-to-not-change-a-light-bulb/comment-page-1/#comment-348164</link>
		<dc:creator>UCantBeSerious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=19977#comment-348164</guid>
		<description>These guys are such hypocritical idiots.  How in the heck can you be against something like this?   They find fault with this type of government intervetion,  but they want the govt to tell you that you cant watch porn?  The grand ole party is in a very sad state these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys are such hypocritical idiots.  How in the heck can you be against something like this?   They find fault with this type of government intervetion,  but they want the govt to tell you that you cant watch porn?  The grand ole party is in a very sad state these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
