Environment Forum

Global environmental challenges

Jan 31, 2011 09:18 EST

Pure water from solar power; will it catch on?

Photo

 Remote villages in developing countries might benefit from these twin 40-ft long containers (left) — a water purification system driven by solar power — as a substitute for noisy diesel-powered generators, trucks bringing in water or people spending hours every day walking to fetch water.

That’s the hope of the makers, environmental technology group SwissINSO Holding Inc. The small company has recently won its first contracts to supply the systems to Algeria and Malaysia and is aiming to sell 42 units of what it calls the world’s “first high-volume, 100 percent-solar turnkey water purification system” in 2011.

The system, an interesting-sounding technology in a world where more than a billion people lack access to fresh water, could also have extra uses from disaster relief to construction sites or to helping armies stay healthy in remote regions.

Chief Executive Yves Ducommun (below right) says that the machines, housed in the two containers, can pump 100,000 litres of drinking water per day for 20 years at a price of less than $0.03 per litre, including running costs. The system costs between $800,000 and $1.2 million up front, depending on factors such as how many solar panels are needed to drive the purification, which filters out dirt and toxins, or salt from seawater, through a membrane.

That is a lot of money for a village in sub-Saharan Africa – but water is often a huge cost over 20 years and governments or aid agencies might be interested: the makers reckon it supplies enough water for about 5,000 people. Freeing people from walking miles to collect water allows them to do other things, like work or study.

“It’s a cost, but if you think of the cost of carrying water by tanker or truck to remote places, or a unit powered by diesel you are in a better position with our system,” Ducommun told me. And climate change may make water supplies less predictable in coming decades with effects such as floods, heatwaves, drought and desertification.

It’s a bit like long-life lightbulbs: the up-front costs are higher but they last far longer: but it’s hard to convince people with the counter-intuitive idea of saving money by spending more now. Investors have not flocked to the idea — the rarely traded shares fell after a major investor pulled out last year, Ducommun said. They last traded at $0.42 against a high of $1.75 in early 2010, giving the company a market capitalisation of about $30 million.

COMMENT

Actually a loop to have solar powering electrolysis and recombination through a fuel cell would work. i have a small working model and did a white paper on it. very few pumps involved, no pressure drop across a membrane. Developed with some SARS techs ex Cdn Military. And as usual no investment in Canada. Canadian Government through Industry Canada has these trade Obligor agreements and bungles any investment in real technology advances and wonders where the jobs are. A shame for a country with as rich a past in R&D achievement, looted by others.

Posted by canad_ian | Report as abusive
Sep 9, 2010 16:23 EDT

The quest to put solar power back on the White House

Photo

Bill McKibben, founder of the green group 350.org, is on a quest to convince President Barack Obama to put solar panels back on the roof of the White House.

He’s at the end of a journey to Washington from Maine in a van fired by biodiesel carrying one of the 32 panels Jimmy Carter unveiled in 1979 during the first press conference on the White House roof.

Also in the van are students from Unity College, which got the the panels some time after President Ronald Reagan, no fan of alternative energy, had workers remove the panels during “roof repairs” in 1986.

McKibben had hoped to meet with somebody high up in the Obama administration such as Carol Browner, Obama’s top energy and climate aide. He’s been talking all week with the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on the plan.

“They keep saying it’s complicated and difficult, but compared with the other tasks they face, we think this one is relatively simple and it would be a great statement,” McKibben said via cell phone from the van.

The White House tells him the administration is greening federal government buildings across the country, which he agrees is a good effort.

Sep 4, 2010 10:18 EDT
COMMENT

Actually, what’s hard to say is that Lomborg isn’t a sophist and a charlatan.

After years of disingenuously denying the climate crisis, he now has the arrogance to assert that he’s smarter than the people who were speaking the truth and who were way ahead of him on his understanding of the subject all along.

These are not original ideas: The debate over research vs. application of green tech has been raging for years among far more serious thinkers than Lomborg. Similarly, with geoengineering. And the preponderance of thought leads to the conclusion that it’s fundamental to start switching our industrial and transportation infrastructure now, and that geoengineering is far from the sure bet he laughably argues — it would be a last desperate and uncertain measure taken only after our fate has been set.

Posted by KenOfGeorgia | Report as abusive
Dec 14, 2009 14:34 EST

Which countries make the grade in solar power?

Photo

Germany is still at the top of the class when it comes to solar power, according to a new report by nonprofit Global Green USA.

The group graded 16 countries plus the state of California in terms of how much solar power they added in installations and what kind of policies they have for future development.

Germany– the world’s biggest solar power market — again got the highest grade, with an A minus.

Italy and environmental trendsetter California pulled a respectable B minus, with nearly 400 percent annual growth in installed capacity.

The group gave Poland and Russia both failing grades because their “governments focused marginally on other renewable energy sources” and do not have any incentives that target photovoltaic solar power systems that turn sunlight into electricity. (Read the full report here.)

With Germany expected to change its solar incentives next year and other places like Ontario moving to support the sector, who will rank at the head of the class in 2010?

Nov 30, 2009 20:03 EST

Gaze into clean technology’s crystal ball for 2010

Photo

Clean technology investors who have suffered through 2009 can find cheer in a new report by the Cleantech Group that gives its top ten predictions for 2010.

The number one prediction: Private capital growth will recover, the research group said.

The group believes that the amount of money from global venture capital and private equity in clean technology in 2010 will surpass that in 2009 “by a healthy margin” and could be a record year. The group also is watching for major investments like Khosla Ventures’ raising $1 billion for renewable energy and clean technology funds, more capital in Asia and innovative fund strategies.

Here are the group’s other predictions for 2010:

2.    Clean economies become the new space race. There will be changes in which countries and cities are driving global momentum, but greater protectionism surrounding the industry will be a drawback.

3.    Electric cars take the back seat to smart mobility. The trend will influence city designs, shipping ports and governments’ tax incentives and budgets.

4.    Resource constraints beyond carbon rise to the fore. As the global economy picks up, there could be price spikes that impact clean technology sectors, pushing companies to use resources more efficiently in order to maintain or boost their profitability.

COMMENT

Nuclear is very clean???!!Are you shore man?Right now there’s no storehouses for nuclear waste products!Obama closed the last big project, where we will keep the garbage? In deep layers of the earth,just like scientist decided to keep CO2???Government don’t think abut the future.

Posted by Igor | Report as abusive
Aug 20, 2009 20:32 EDT

Smithsonian gets solar panel that once graced White House roof

Photo

U.S. President Barack Obama has made climate change legislation one of his top goals and has pushed for more clean, renewable energy like solar and wind power.

But back in 1979, when another Democrat was in the White House, 32 solar panels graced the roof above the Oval Office.

Part of an initiative called “Solar America,” the panels turned sunlight into electricity that heated water in the staff kitchen — which President Jimmy Carter often used. They were removed during Ronald Reagan’s administration in 1986.

Now, one of those presidential solar panels has joined the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History in Washington, DC.

“The White House solar panel is evidence of an American president leading by example to promote his administration’s agenda,” Harry Rubenstein, chair of the museum’s division of politics and reform, said in a statement. “It displays how President Carter reinforced his policies through a personal gesture taking place in his own home.”

Unity College donated the panel to the museum this summer. The college in rural Maine got the panels in 1991. It refurbished some of them and installed them on top of the college cafeteria, and the panels heated water there until they maxed out their life span in 2005.

We were wondering if readers would like to see Obama install solar panels on top of the White House again? It would certainly send a message — similar to the example set by First Lady Michelle Obama when she planted a vegetable garden on the White House lawn to promote healthy eating.

COMMENT

Of this whole issue, the most important fact is that the Solar Panel is once again coming into use at the White House. That is important than anything else. This should be an example for the whole country how power needs to be conserved by solar energy usage.

Jul 20, 2009 06:13 EDT

Tuvalu turns to solar energy – against rising seas

Photo

With a highest point 4.5 metres above sea level, the Pacific island state of Tuvalu plans to shift to generate all electricity from renewable energies by 2020, hoping to push other countries to follow suit to fight global warming.

These solar panels (left) on the main soccer stadium in Funafuti, the capital, are the first step in the plan to end dependence on fossil fuels and slow climate change blamed for pushing up world sea levels. Tuvalu’s goal is to generate all electricity from wind, solar and other green sources.

By contrast, European Union nations have among the most ambitious goals among developed countries, aiming to get 20 percent of all energy from renewable sources by 2020.

Tuvalu’s plan – story here - will cost more than $20 million and will require a lot depend heavily on aid from abroad. That’s a big cost for each of the atolls’ 12,000 citizens - $1,666 – but can have other benefits such as avoiding tanker spills from imported oil.

And the plan sounds to me exactly the sort of ”measureable, reportable and verifiable” actions to offset climate change that are being demanded of developing nations in U.N. negotiations on a new climate treaty due to be agreed in December.

The Maldives in the Indian Ocean have set an even more ambitious goal of becoming the first “carbon neutral” nation over the next decade. The archipelago plans to shift to wind and solar power and buy carbon credits to offset emissions from tourists flying to visit its luxury vacation resorts.

So if Tuvalu or the Maldives can go green, so can others?

COMMENT

This is a pretty cool story, it amazes me how serious people can be about green energy when their part in the environmental decline is miniscule at best. They might not consume energy on a large scale but their commitment is commendable.

Their are a lot of projects that are in motion in the US right now, but it’s still just a small dent in the energy we consume on a day to day basis. I don’t think people actually realize just how much energy we are consuming as a nation. Their are websites like solar energy facts that you can read about it. It truly is staggering how much work is ahead of us to be free of the fossil fuel.

Posted by Eliwagar1 | Report as abusive
Jan 21, 2009 15:30 EST

From Suds to Sunshine in Brooklyn

Photo

A green contracting outfit based in a former Brooklyn brewery says it’s the first business in a major U.S. city that can sell power back to the grid that it generates from the sun.

New York state gave Big Sue, LLC, which has about 3,500 square feet of solar panels on its roof, the OK to sell any extra power it generates from the panels back to the grid.

For years, homeowners who have put solar panels on their roofs have been able to sell a bit of solar power back to the grid, which has helped them deal with the big costs of buying and installing the panels. For homeowners it can take 8 to 12 years to break even on the initial investment.

New York businesses, which have shorter break-even times on their solar investments due to greater availability of  tax breaks and incentives,  have had to wait until now to get net-metering rights.

But eventually commercial net-metering could help New York deal with growing power demand. Gov. David Paterson said in a press release about Big Sue that businesses with solar net-metering will “relieve stress on New York City’s overburdened” power grid.

David Buckner, the president of Solar Energy Systems, who installed Big Sue’s solar panels, said he has 15 other commercial projects lined up for net-metering, including a bicycle manufacturer and a perfume bottle top maker. (Full disclosure: Solar Energy Systems’ COO is the husband of a colleague of mine.)

Small manufacturers stand to gain the most from net-metering because of the way the law is written, he said.  At least 35 other businesses in the region are lining up for net-metering with other solar installers.

Dec 12, 2008 15:26 EST

Economy leaves consumers feeling more blue than green

Photo

Has the global economic crisis got you feeling more blue than green? If so, you’re not alone.

U.S. consumers are pulling back spending on everything, and carbon-cutting products like hybrid cars and solar panels are no exception. After all, being green often requires us to pony up big chunks of change with the promise of cost savings later. That pitch, according to many green business owners, isn’t working so well these days.

“People are so scared about the future that they don’t want to commit to paybacks that have too long a window,” said Alan Finkel, owner of Santa Monica-based Green Life Guru, a company that helps homeowners reduce their gas and electricity usage.

A sharp drop in oil prices since this summer hasn’t helped the trend. After all, who needs a hybrid car when fill-ups cost less than $20 a pop?

Of course, there are ways to be green without spending money. We can drive less, recycle more, and resist the urge to crank up the thermostat.

Has the dour economy weakened your green resolve? If not, how are you able to do it without breaking the bank?

PHOTO: Reuters/Fred Prouser

COMMENT

This all reminds me of FDR’s “There’s nothing to fear but fear itself.” Now, more than ever, is the time for the United States, and Americans, to take the leap of faith — and invest more robustly in renewables, like solar. Fortunately, countries like Germany have seen the light and just yesterday boosted state-backed lending for renewable energy projects to 50 million euros ($67 million) from 20 million previously. The economics of solar power, in Germany at least, are irresistable. It’s a no-risk investment with handsome returns. If the United States gets the right framework in place, I bet people would be coming out of the woodwork to put money into win-win-win investment: lower CO2, create jobs and have a source of electricity that pays for itself within a decade or so. I wish Americans could start thinking a little bit more long term. I had the chance to listen to SolarWorld’s CEO and a few other German solar business leaders a few weeks ago — they sounded remarkably unworried about the economic downturn. http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk  /LA485999.htm

Posted by Erik Kirschbaum | Report as abusive
Dec 4, 2008 13:11 EST

Solar car “crashes” at end of round the world trip

Photo

Luckily for my colleague, photographer Kacper Pempel, this solar powered “taxi” was not going very fast when it smashed through a wall of polystyrene at the end of a 52,000 km trip around the world.

It stopped pretty much in the debris of the makeshift wall after the deliberate “crash” marking the finish outside the venue of Dec. 1-12 U.N. climate talks in Poland. (Click here for a story)

Driver Louis Palmer, a Swiss teacher (in blue, lower right), has driven through 38 nations over 17 months, the first time a solar-powered car has gone round the world. He ended the final stretch at U.N. climate talks with Yvo de Boer, the head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat as a passenger.

I have enjoyed following Louis’ travels. He once gave me a lift a year ago at the last U.N. climate conference in Bali, Indonesia and the car was certainly zippier under the tropical sun than it was in mid-winter Poland.  Whatever the location the car was quite difficult to drive because of its length: it tows a flat-backed trailer covered with solar panels.

Louis says that his trip shows that the world needs more electric powered vehicles….Is this the way forward for carmakers?

COMMENT

There are very many examples of home-made electric cars on YouTube and other video sites. The motors, controllers and deep-cycle batteries are readily available and are relativly inexpensive.

Posted by Lamar Havard | Report as abusive
  •