Eric Burroughs

Eric Burroughs's Profile

Warning signs on market liquidity risks

May 15, 2011

If the great commodity selloff of 2011 shows nothing else, it is that markets are undergoing serious structural changes that need to be followed closely. Our commodities analyst John Kemp has compared the oil plunge with the May 2010 flash crash in U.S. shares, and rightfully so. Four standard deviation moves in oil futures are not normal, even if Gaussian distributions underestimate the chance of such a move. The rise of high-speed electronic trading appears to be creating imbalances between buyers and sellers in nanoseconds that lead to outsized moves. It would probably be manageable if these problems were tied to smaller markets not so correlated with the rest of the world. But in this age of highly correlated global markets, these changes matter and need to be better understood — both by market participants and regulators.

One curious outcome about the rise of algo-driven trading is the volume is not leading to better liquidity, especially in these flash crashes. Liquidity — defined as the ease with which trades can take place without causing a major price  impact (and not referring here to overall bank liquidity/funding risk) — appears to suddenly vanish in some of these big market moves, leading to massive swings.

Liquidity is a fundamental part of market dynamics — how to think about where to buy and sell — and is almost always at the root of market stress. On a day to day basis, the dynamic is fairly natural. Traders closely follow chart levels, such as Fibonacci retracements, in part because stop-loss orders can accumulate around those levels, leading to sudden lurches — a relatively illiquid imbalance in trading as the burst of selling pushes bid/ask spreads wider. Such moves can define the trend of the day, change the near-term trend or even the long-term trend when they strike at a crucial moment. There’s no doubt that old-fashioned leverage, stop-losses, option-related gamma selling and the sort played a role, as our Reuters special report fleshed out. Yet those factors still do not explain some of the severe intra-minute and intra-hour volatility.  There is nothing normal about these new kind of market moves. As much as bubbles are normal, and silver looked bubbly, there was no reason why the silver selloff should have had a bigger impact on oil than gold — and expose weaknesses in the trade of WTI and Brent futures, even with the leverage that had built up in those markets. Leverage alone does not explain this new brand of chaotic market swings.

There’s a few ways to guess what happened here. One is that algo-driven selling dominated to the point that it overwhelmed buyers and potentially even led other players to pull bids. Computers created the two liquidity crises the SEC described in its report on why the Wall Street flash crash unfolded the way it did, with the hectic HFT trading prompting bids to be pulled. As the SEC described it: “This sudden decline in both price and liquidity may be symptomatic of the notion that prices were moving so fast, fundamental buyers and cross-market arbitrageurs were either unable or unwilling to supply enough buy-side liquidity.” A perfect recipe for a price vacuum and severe downdraft.

What it suggests is that the computers are not providing liquidity, and in fact may be pulling liquidity in nanoseconds at just the time it is most needed. Air pockets seem to develop, leading to a flurry of offers and thinning bids — and that’s when the moves are the most severe. In the past year, flash crashes have now happened in benchmark U.S. equity indexes, oil futures and even dollar/yen (when the plunge to record lows happened on heavy structured product hedging in the least liquid hours of global FX trade). What happened to market makers? That’s a question that needs to be answered. It appears that computers are reading computers, knowing when others are pulling back and prompting other funds/banks to do the same (not to mention the occasional runaway algo).

Why so? This may be the impact of liquidaty-adjusted value-at-risk gauges, otherwise known as LVaR. LVaR makes a lot of sense: you want your trading desk and portfolio risk to be judged not just on standard deviations of volatility, but to also factor in market liquidity on the price at which you might be able to sell since VaR is all about minimizing potential losses. On a basic level, LVaR can incorporate unusual changes in bid/ask quotes — using standard deviations on mean bid/ask spreads — to give risk signals. The further the mean bid/ask spread from the mean, the more dangerous the market conditions.

A 2007 paper published by New York University’s Stern School of Business explains the potential negative feedback loop from market participants using LVaR gauges.

“Subjecting traders to an LVaR gives rise to a multiplier effect. Tighter risk management leads to more restricted positions, hence longer expected selling times, implying higher risk over the expected selling period, which further tightens the risk management, and so on. This feedback between liquidity and risk management can help explain why liquidity can suddenly drop. We show that this ‘snowballing’ illiquidity can arise if volatility rises, or if more agents face reduced risk-bearing capacity— for instance, because of investor redemptions, losses, or increased risk aversion.”

This is a recipe not just for more severe market volatility, but also raising the risk of a market crash or shock with no economic origin which still inflicts economic damage. We’re going to have to look more into what the bid/ask data of the big selloff days show.

The other question is the role of ETFs. Some of the most volatile swings in silver and oil happened in less-liquid Asian hours. Asian trading is a time when any big buyer or seller would almost certainly avoid stepping in, knowing full well that liquidity is not what it is during New York and London hours. Computers obviously have fewer such compunctions. Metals traders in Asia blamed ETFs for the sharp silver selloff. To be honest, I don’t know how ETFs trade into market moves in a 24-hour market cycle, given the need to track index performance. It’s something I’ll be following up on. But are ETFs pro-cyclical traders in illiquid market moves? Are humans or computers making the trading decisions? Are the algos able to make split-second liquidity trading decisions? ETF prospectuses don’t give much clarity on how they trade, other than warning about liquidity as one market risk. But the rise of ETFs, especially leveraged ETFs, only appears to be adding to the liquidity risks now gripping markets. The Financial Stability Board recently noted the risks from ETFs, especially those that provide on-demand redemption and liquidity but deal in less-than-liquid markets (think silver):  ”The expectation of on-demand liquidity may create the conditions for acute redemption pressures on certain types of ETFs in situations of market stress, which could in turn affect the liquidity of the large asset managers and banks active in this market.” And of course flash crashes in commodity markets don’t just affect professional investors, thanks to ETFs.

A lot of smart firms have invested a lot of money into liquidity risk management. But these massive intraday market swings must be keeping a few risk managers up at night. Just as computer-driven portfolio insurance sparked the uneconomic 1987 crash, we are now starting to see clear signs that modern algos and ETFs are likely causing uneconomic market dislocations. A better understanding of the role of their impact on market liquidity is urgent.

One last note on silver. The clues for what happened that sparked the severe silver volatility, April 25 appears to be one of the days to focus on. That’s when volumes in the iShares Silver Trust (SLV) ETF suddenly surged and trading became more erratic. On that day, trading activity soared: the ratio of daily volume to the 30-day average shot up to more than 4 times, the second highest ever on data going back five years, and it would have been the highest if not for an odd one-day volume spike on Nov. 9 last year. Volume only swelled from there as the market peaked and turned. A pure guess in reading the charts is that the seeds for the ensuing chaos were sowed on April 25.

 

Comments

Nos encanta tu sección, un derroche de imaginación por todos lados. Asiduos a este blog sin duda! un beso.

 

The result of this is the buildup of cellular tissue, especially in muscles, called anabolism (which is the set of metabolic pathways that generate molecules from smaller units). Sadly, many of them fail to live up to the public’s expectations of them. Her admission disqualified her from her winnings and the results were scrapped.

 

that was not david gardocki
that was michael

 

The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

 

I love that! It is so true, the most successful individuals have unsuccessful repeatedly. party

 

I love that! It is so true, the most successful individuals have unsuccessful repeatedly. party

 

Best shown… The sort of individuals who have the target which Mom Frd provides prosper in your life. Education

 

Aye See More About this topic: GOT

 

Goals and a lot of the periods ideas certainly are a commodity. A dime twelve. It’s all about performance, and using the initial step.

 

Excellent stage, I realize. To each and every their particular play

 

A lot of people stay caught up on fantasizing which is why they don’t succeed in their life. Obtaining the bravery to do this is critical. You can aspiration provided you want there are plenty of to get started on performing eventually.

 

inspirational quotes.. thanks a lot neil.. Insurance

 

that’s good, thanks for sharing,.. I think this is great blog

 

This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

 

Speculate I explained, you will need to innovate with a number of amount for those to possess a explanation to select anyone.

 

that’s good, thanks for sharing,.. I think this is great blog

 

My favorite is: grocery

 

You are proper and much more frequently absolutely nothing, folks are just uninformed and still have however to get experience of what is on the market.

 

My personal some other form of precisely the same saying:
“Hurry way up as well as fail, so you can start succeeding.Inches

 

We adored the check Entrance ones, specially the means folks think ‘microsoft’ and also The apple company are at battle.

 

Very good site thank you so much for your time in writing the posts.http://asctanks.com.au

 

I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

 

that’s good, thanks for sharing,.. I think this is great blog

 

that’s good, thanks for sharing,.. I think this is great blog

 

Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

 

that’s good, thanks for sharing,.. I think this is great blog

 

I have read a few just right stuff here. Certainly value bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how so much attempt you place to create this sort of great informative website.

 

Simply a smiling visitor here to share the love (:, btw great design and style. “Better by far you should forget and smile than that you should remember and be sad.” by Christina Georgina Rossetti.

 

I believe this website has got some real wonderful information for everyone : D.

 

I do accept as true with all of the ideas you have offered for your post. They are very convincing and can certainly work. Still, the posts are too brief for novices. Could you please prolong them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.

 

Your info is one of the most vital information for me. And i’m glad studying your topic. This topic is definitely beautifully written; its great piece of work.

 

Very neat blog article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

 

The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

 

Great blog.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.

 

I am so grateful for your article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

 

Looking forward to reading more. Great post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

 

Very good blog post. Great.

 

Here are several of the incredible figures that help to make up Charlie Bronson’s incredibly intriguing history.

 

Charlie’s recognition has spread out side of the United Kingdom, and a few years ago world heavyweight champion Mike Tyson dedicated his title belt to him. In an entertaining reciprocal gesture, Charlie managed to arrange a pewter imitation of his cell door to be given to Mike at a recent award ceremony. Clearly the replica was not to scale.

 

I cling on to listening to the news update speak about getting boundless online grant applications so I have been looking around for the finest site to get one. Could you tell me please, where could i get some?

 

If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

 

I think this is a real great article post. Fantastic.

 

Really enjoyed this article post.Thanks Again. Great.

 

I truly appreciate this article.Really thank you! Really Cool.

 

I appreciate you sharing this blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

 

Nice blog here! Also your website loads up fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol

 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  • About Eric

    "Asia Financial Markets Editor based in Hong Kong overseeing markets coverage across Asia-Pacific. Hyper-contrarian, uber-geek on charts and semi-regular tweeter. Any inadvertent opinions expressed are mine alone."
    Joined Reuters:
    2000
    Awards:
    2009 Reuters Editor of the Year
  • Contact Eric

  • Follow Eric