Comments on: Lutz: Volt electric concept car no PR ploy http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/ Our coverage of worldwide events Sun, 7 Sep 2008 07:03:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: lnmassaro http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-275999 lnmassaro Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:15:29 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-275999 From their website, the Volt appears to be just pr and that's it. Tellingly, there is no info on manufacturing plans, or even expectations. If GM wants to turn its company around, it needs to PRODUCE THIS CAR, and tell the oil companies to go to hell. From their website, the Volt appears to be just pr and that’s it. Tellingly, there is no info on manufacturing plans, or even expectations. If GM wants to turn its company around, it needs to PRODUCE THIS CAR, and tell the oil companies to go to hell.

]]> By: Chevy Volt Fan http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-182349 Chevy Volt Fan Sun, 20 May 2007 21:29:02 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-182349 The only way American car companies are going to be able to compete with the Japanese is by beating them at their own game, TECHNOLOGY. I compiled some videos, audio clips, pictures and more of the <a href="http://www.chevy-volt.net" rel="nofollow">Chevy Volt Concept Car</a> , check them out online at http://www.chevy-volt.net The only way American car companies are going to be able to compete with the Japanese is by beating them at their own game, TECHNOLOGY.

I compiled some videos, audio clips, pictures and more of the Chevy Volt Concept Car , check them out online at http://www.chevy-volt.net

]]> By: Used Car Parts Guy http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-171781 Used Car Parts Guy Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:24:39 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-171781 one day we hope to buy a car that runs on no fuel other than solor light from the sun. Out here in Arizona we have the sun to power a car and all it has to do is be able to make it to and from work. 90 miles round trip nd I think you might have a winner. one day we hope to buy a car that runs on no fuel other than solor light from the sun. Out here in Arizona we have the sun to power a car and all it has to do is be able to make it to and from work. 90 miles round trip nd I think you might have a winner.

]]> By: Matt http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-89516 Matt Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:14:23 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2007/01/08/lutz-volt-electric-concept-car-no-pr-ploy/#comment-89516 It's great to see a major automaker finally moving forward on what small companies have been proving possible for several years (see Energy CS, CalCars and HyMotion). But while the announcement is exciting, GM still isn't giving any solid timeline on WHEN we can see these cars on the road or HOW MANY cars are actually going to be produced - at best they say 3-4 years if the battery technology is available. There is a demand for plug-in hybrids NOW - there are hundreds of cities, counties, utility districts and fleets already placing "soft orders" for such vehicles. Such early-adopters of these vehicles would provide test markets for GM to refine the technology and build public confidence and interest in these cars. I have to admit I'm a little concerned that they will use the announcement of these concept cars more to clean up their image than clean up their product line. There is a lot GM can do between now and when we may see these concept vehicles actually on the road. We all know increasing fuel efficiency is the direction automakers need to head so lets get past the hype of a handful of concept vehicles and look at what they are doing with the rest of their fleet. Overall average fuel economy from the Big 6 is worse today that it was 10 years ago and GM is still heavily dependent on its gas guzzling truck lines. In addition to that they are still fighting tooth-and-nail against increasing fuel economy regulations, suing states that try to limit greenhouse gas emissions, and in December argued before the Supreme Court that carbon from tailpipe emissions was not even a pollutant. GM is still planning to expand their Hummer line to become 25% of their overall sales. Consumers still have limited options to find fuel-efficient cars that are affordable, well-built, and fun to drive. There are plenty of things automakers can do today to increase fuel economy and I'm tired of being shown distracting concept cars that we won't see for 3-4 years if ever. I've been working with the Freedom From Oil Campaign to make automakers honestly prioritize fuel economy and move beyond oil check out what we do at http://www.FreedomFromOil.org It’s great to see a major automaker finally moving forward on what small companies have been proving possible for several years (see Energy CS, CalCars and HyMotion). But while the announcement is exciting, GM still isn’t giving any solid timeline on WHEN we can see these cars on the road or HOW MANY cars are actually going to be produced - at best they say 3-4 years if the battery technology is available. There is a demand for plug-in hybrids NOW - there are hundreds of cities, counties, utility districts and fleets already placing “soft orders” for such vehicles. Such early-adopters of these vehicles would provide test markets for GM to refine the technology and build public confidence and interest in these cars.

I have to admit I’m a little concerned that they will use the announcement of these concept cars more to clean up their image than clean up their product line. There is a lot GM can do between now and when we may see these concept vehicles actually on the road.

We all know increasing fuel efficiency is the direction automakers need to head so lets get past the hype of a handful of concept vehicles and look at what they are doing with the rest of their fleet. Overall average fuel economy from the Big 6 is worse today that it was 10 years ago and GM is still heavily dependent on its gas guzzling truck lines. In addition to that they are still fighting tooth-and-nail against increasing fuel economy regulations, suing states that try to limit greenhouse gas emissions, and in December argued before the Supreme Court that carbon from tailpipe emissions was not even a pollutant. GM is still planning to expand their Hummer line to become 25% of their overall sales. Consumers still have limited options to find fuel-efficient cars that are affordable, well-built, and fun to drive. There are plenty of things automakers can do today to increase fuel economy and I’m tired of being shown distracting concept cars that we won’t see for 3-4 years if ever.

I’ve been working with the Freedom From Oil Campaign to make automakers honestly prioritize fuel economy and move beyond oil check out what we do at http://www.FreedomFromOil.org

]]>