<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Praying for news at the Vatican</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Heneghan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Heneghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Not so fast, Matt! You&#039;re getting ahead of the story. The post did NOT say &quot;Barth and Ben&quot; had reached any such agreement. That would be news and I wouldn&#039;t be publishing it just on the blog. What the post did was draw attention to the fact that Kasper said the ancient hierarchy system could not be restored. I hadn&#039;t heard it put this way before. We know that Moscow doesn&#039;t like the ancient hierarchy, since it would leave out the Russian Orthodox Church. The &quot;Hmmm&quot; transition means the question now is whether any such idea is making the rounds. You make a good point that other primates would also have something to say about any tinkering with or sidelining of the ancient hierarchy. So anything along these lines would require lots -- which means years, if not decades -- of discussion before it came about (if at all...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast, Matt! You&#8217;re getting ahead of the story. The post did NOT say &#8220;Barth and Ben&#8221; had reached any such agreement. That would be news and I wouldn&#8217;t be publishing it just on the blog. What the post did was draw attention to the fact that Kasper said the ancient hierarchy system could not be restored. I hadn&#8217;t heard it put this way before. We know that Moscow doesn&#8217;t like the ancient hierarchy, since it would leave out the Russian Orthodox Church. The &#8220;Hmmm&#8221; transition means the question now is whether any such idea is making the rounds. You make a good point that other primates would also have something to say about any tinkering with or sidelining of the ancient hierarchy. So anything along these lines would require lots &#8212; which means years, if not decades &#8212; of discussion before it came about (if at all&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 05:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post.  It is the first I heard about the Barth. and Ben. reaching this agreement.  It won&#039;t just be Moscow who will have issues with this.  Alexandria, Antioch, Bucharest and all the other Orthodox primates will have to think about what this means, as will their flocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.  It is the first I heard about the Barth. and Ben. reaching this agreement.  It won&#8217;t just be Moscow who will have issues with this.  Alexandria, Antioch, Bucharest and all the other Orthodox primates will have to think about what this means, as will their flocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/11/23/praying-for-news-at-the-vatican/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this. Well writen and very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this. Well writen and very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
