Saint Pius XII? Not so fast…

December 20, 2007

Andrea Tornielli’s book on Pius XII

During World War Two, Pope Pius XII was (1) a saintly man, (2) Hitler’s Pope or (3) neither of the above. This question continues to weigh on Catholic-Jewish relations despite all the progress made since the Second Vatican Council. It would be easy to assume that Catholics answer (1) and Jews (2), but the debate is far more complex than that. There are Catholics who say Pius didn’t do enough to help the Jews and Jews who defend him as doing everything he could under the circumstances.

The issue keeps smouldering because the Catholic Church is considering Pius for possible beatification and sainthood. The U.S.-based Anti-Defamation League has urged the Church to suspend the procedure until the Vatican declassifies all its wartime archives. The Vatican opened its archives up to 1939 — the end of the papacy of Pope Pius XI — in 2005, but it is still processing the files from Pope Pius XII’s papacy (1939-1958). In the meantime, the controversy has produced a steady stream of books on Pius XII and the Holocaust, only some of which are thumbnailed below.

Hitler’s Pope by John CornwellThe Defamation of Pius XII. By Ralph McInernyPope Benedict XVI has now slowed down the procedure by asking for a further review of the Pius XII dossier, which is 3,500 pages long. Andrea Tornielli, Vatican correspondent of the Italian daily Il Giornale, has reported that Benedict has also decided to set up a committee to review the issue and is concerned about the possible reaction if the Vatican beatified Pius XII too soon. Tornielli, whose fourth book about Pius XII was published in May, says Hitler, the War, and the Pope. By Ronald J. Rychlakthe pontiff was The Myth of Hitler’s Pope: How Pope Pius XII Rescued Jews from the Nazis. By Rabbi David G. Dalinnot a callous anti-Semite as some critics portray him.

“This is a black legend that refuses to die. Pius XII has become a lightning rod for all the presumed responsibilities of the Catholic Church in that period,” Tornielli told our Vatican correspondent Philip Pullella. “It is impossible to have a calm historical debate about Pius because he has been branded ‘the Nazi Pope’ and this is a According to the Archives of the Vatican. By Pierre Blet, S.J.Inside the Secret Archives That Reveal the New Story of the Nazis and the Church, by Peter Godmanclear distortion of history.”

Father Peter Gumbel, the Jesuit who heads the Church probe int Pius’s qualification for sainthood, said that the department responsible for saints believed the late pope met the requirements for beatification, the first step towards sainthood. It has documented this in a 3,500-page dossier for his “cause,” the Vatican term for the procedure to declare someone a saint.

Defending Pope Plus XII, by Margherita MarchioneThe Vatican’s Role in the Rise of Modern Anti-Semitism, by David I. KertzerIn an important cause like this, the Supreme Pontiff wants to think and wants to see things. He is a man of study,” Gumpel told Pullella. He said he had no official word that Pope Benedict had set up a special committee to review the dossier once again, but he thought the Vatican was right to be cautious, especially given the fact that Jewish community leaders and historians were themselves split over Pius XII and his role.

Constantine’s Sword. The Church and the Jews: A History. By James CarrollThe Memoir of an American Diplomat During World War II. By William H. Tittman“The pope wants excellent relations with Israel and with the Jewish community and wants to see if any legitimate problem could arise. .. It will have to be seen from a diplomatic point of view if any reasonable, legitimate objections are arise. I’m certain this is not the case but it is a precaution so the pope can always say this has been examined from every possible angle and he can say ‘I’m sorry, study the matter and you will see that these The Hidden Encyclical of Pius XI, By Georges PasselecqThe Catholic Church during the Holocaust and Today, by Daniel Goldhagenobjections are not true.”

“I personally remain convinced of the merits of this cause. It’s simply a question of time for this decree to be signed.”

Are you convinced that Pius XII was a saintly man? Or Hitler’s Pope? Or do you think this issue has become so polarised that it is difficult, if not impossible, to come to an agreed version of what he did and did not do?

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

[...] From Reuters’ FaithWorld, 12.20.2007. [...]

That the Church and its popes,including especially Pius XII, have been for centuries ant-semetic, and literally almost singlehandedly created this virulent strain of hatred, hateful statement by hateful statement, throughout Europe and everywhere else it pressed its sick influence, is simply beyond all historical question. The historical fact that this particular pope required that Jewish parents give up their children for adoption by Christians, in ordr to save them from the Nazis and facsist criminals, with the requirement and the clear premise that they be forced, if not artfully persuaded, to convert to Catholicism, together with his documented complicity with the still undisputed fact that ALL the fake passports provided to ALL the escaping Nazis leaders and its other principles in genocide, to include homegrown Italian Fascist confederates, were ALL provided their fake passports by the Catholic Church as authorized by him through its divines, which passports allowed most of these criminals to escape justice for many years, if not altogether, is evidence enough for anyone as to this evil man’s true character, or lack of one. Was not the Church then and equally responsibly complicit in what befell the Jews at the hands of the Fascists and Nazis, and in the aftermath of the Hitler War? Was not the current pope a not innocent, gleeful member the Hitler Youth as well. Is this is the sort of person who is taking the decision, indeed is expected, to beautify the criminally complicit Pius XII? That would be funny if the situation and subject personalities were not so exceedingly grotesque! But it is too typical nonetheless of the Church’s past historically obscene conduct and sordid acts of complicity, which seems destined to be repeated in future because its true history is either blithely ignored or covered-up by Church hierarchy with pieties and assorted nonsense.

Posted by Edwardian | Report as abusive

[...] daily newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano. Critics have long accused Pope Pius XII of failing to help Jews during the Holocaust and his successors of failing to say mea culpa in apology. German-born Pope [...]