The reason the God particle is so elusive? God will not allow you to know what he knows. You are wasting your money. You are like Eve, wanting to be as wise as God. But God is just silly superstition to those who try to find him through science.

Yes, the “HIGGS BOSON” is refered to as the god particle. We should not seek the Scientific side of life.
We are no longer the leaders inthe world in science, math, health care, or anything else! But we lead the way in the Military Industrial Complex. Why spend billions on the trueth we we can spend it on BOMBS to take lives from those who do not agree with our religious beliefs.
A M E N !!!

, These Physicists are about to understand finally, that there are two realms the Physical and the Angelical. Something had to start the bang. The God Partical which is the Divine natural cause. But the Divine will only allow them to know what he wants them to as in the scripture Genesis 11:1-9. Why do Physicists ponder on this like in Genesis? It is unclean spirts that are controlling the minds of the Physicists, but it is not there fault in perspective, they have been led astray by the unclean spirts to do this project. As crazy as this seems it is the cause and effect of the Divine nature

I personnally do not believe in the God Particle, the Higgs particle, because I think they should already have found it a long time ago. I also do not believe in a graviton to explain gravity … it is too easy : when you cannot explain something, you just create another something to imagine what happens, but that also does not explain anything.
Maybe the Higgs ” field ” exists, if we may call it aether, yes why not …. but particles moving in it and gaining mass ….. I think for exemple they then should slow down at some moment …
No ! I believe only in energy, it’s all about energy and vibrations/energy fields !! I think MATTER only is existing when mass particles come together to form atoms and molecules and matter is just the new vibration on a different level created by the protons and neutrons and electrons together … it is the vibration/energy field of the atom, of the molecule … Mass becomes matter only on atom scale, I think you have MASS particles ( proton, electron, neutron ) and massless ones ( photons ) and when you put mass particles together they form a atom, and that atom IS MATTER.
If I may explain it this way : it feels like matter in the same way that you can feel a resistance when you put 2 magnets North against North : you feel resistance, the more you want to put them together, the more resistance you feel … and MATTER IS resistance - it’s all a question of vibrations, energy fields.
Photons have NO MASS, but they can give energy to mass particles - electrons - to move on a higher level, and when the electron looses its energy again it gives birth to a photon …. When you knock on matter, you knock on a energy field !! do you really think that your feet are walking on the ELECTRONS ( around the nuclei ) of the stones ?? You surely also do not walk on the protons ! the electrons of your feet atoms are NOT touching the electrons of the stone atoms : you walk on a energy field created by the ATOM of the stone, the electrons around the nucleus !! otherwise you would smash and crush the atoms or you would be like a photon pushing electrons away !!!!! Not convinced ?

i can see the confusion between trying to figure out if the Boggs particle will disprove God. But science explains things scientifically and when you can look at undeniable prophecy that no group of the wisest scientists could have come up with- had they been transported back to Old Testament times- you come up with miracles that science can’t begin to try to explain. And they won’t try because they would look foolish. But these were simple men who were told what to write and yet they foretold things that would occur time and time again, never being wrong. It would be impossible for scientists with all they have at their disposal to be able to predict all this prophecy. So if these are miracles that had to have more than human influence or lucky guesses to take place, then it goes beyond science. As one scientist put it who is a Christian, taking even 10 of the prophecies out of hundreds and having them all turn out as predicted, the odds are overwhelming to happen by chance. There is more chance a cat could jump up on a taple where was was different colors of paint in on a eisel and knock it over and create the Mona Lisa, then for 10 of these prophecies to take place.

Some things are better left untouched as I always say. Maybe us being the creatures we are shouldn’t understand what everything really is, maybe it was just meant to be there. Sure we could use this technology to create a better life for the people of tomorrow but ya know what if something goes wrong here and creates something bad. Think of hiroshima in 1945….we developed the atomic bomb. Now…..we’ve got even worse things. Though I look at it from a positive way of creating travel through time and space…..and a bad thing of creating a paridox and destroying anything and everything.

1. I like the thought of revealing a particle that produces mass - but then, that particle must also be made up of something…I wonder how minute we can go? Fascinating.
2. When my mother was dying, she said, “There is only one thing I know for sure: things change.” This statement sucked me into a vortex of clarity that made my eyes burn with tears. Everywhere I look I see change, and evidently, everywhere I can’t look, also. Motion and interaction seem to be key in everything, even vacuum states. The only time I have witnessed “nothingness” was when my mum’s soul left her body. Or, as she said, was that merely a “change?”
3. I envy you believers and you non-believers. At least you KNOW something. I, on the other hand, know nothing…
4. “What will be, will be.” -Doris Day
5. “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” Juliet as written by William Shakespeare (translation - it is what it is - our names are meaningless)

if there is a God, it woul be preposterous to believe This God did not create the universe, Himself being the only thing allowing something possibly capable and by definition of God,supreme, and if there is a God, it is also preposterous to believe that we can assume to understand Him without having observed, and then say that He can only be found in the non particle, or the “un-” substance of His own creation cannot be justified. Whether the potter is also the clay, the potter but not the pot, will be the only conclusion from the god-particle. Either way this creation being that, must reflect, as every creation, its creator in some way.

oh and yes there is a car that makes about 300 mpg modestly. However technological capability does not neccessitate nor finance the implementation of that kind of an innovation to date, it will become practical when a corporate body must advance in this way to survive, or competition escalates to this level. Otherwise, read about it in popular science, and then don’t read about how its trial in Socal was shut down by giant corporations because the innovator lacked the economic power to compete. That’s life.

So where did the God particle come from? Are there yet smaller and smaller particles? Will this answer all of our questions of life the universe and everything. I doubt it. But all these projects sound cool and keep the money in the pockets of those who have and out of those who have not. Let’s use our money for better projects.

Yea we can figure out how the universe works but we can’t make a freaking car that gets 100 mpg. What a joke. We don’t know jack. Yes people some science is a wast of time and money IMO.

… as long as finding the God particle does not create a hell on earth…

CERN predicts the creation of up to 1 micro black hole per second in the Large Hadron Collider and references the 1999 RHIC safety study as proof of safety. (But the 1999 RHIC safety study only ruled out any possibility of colliders creating micro black holes based on knowledge at that time.)

CERN’s web site predicts that micro black holes will evaporate. (But Hawking Radiation has been disputed by no less than 3 peer reviewed studies that found no basis in science for such conclusions).

CERN’s web site and Steven Hawking state that much greater energy cosmic ray impacts with Earth prove safety. (But higher energy cosmic ray impacts with stationary particles have net collision speeds less than the speed of light and send all particles created safely into space, while head-on collider collisions have net collision impact speeds at almost twice the speed of light and are designed to focus all the energy to a single point in space and particles created may be captured by Earth’s gravity).

CERN promised to create and release an new safety report before the end of 2007. (CERN’s LHC Safety Assessment Group has concluded that cosmic ray impacts do not prove safety and they do not assume that micro black holes will evaporate, but CERN never released any safety reports created by their LHC Safety Assessment Group.)

Professor Otto Rossler calculates that a single micro black hole could accrete the Earth is as few as 50 months and Dr. Rossler is world recognized as one of the most prestigious, most eminent, award winning scientists alive. (But CERN has not scientifically refuted his calculations that I am aware of, CERN only promised Dr. Rossler that if they create stable micro black holes that they will stop the experiment. Will that be too late?)

Even though the Large Hadron Collider will create conditions not seen in Nature since the first fraction of a second prior to the big bang, CERN asserts that there is no risk to the planet. (But the legal action contends a 75% probability of risk with very high degree of uncertainty calculated by a scientist with a masters degree in statistics, and alleges that Chief Scientific Officer Mr. Engelen passed an internal memorandum to workers at CERN asking them regardless of personal opinion to affirm in all interviews that there were no risks involved in the experiments, changing CERN’s previous assertion of minimal risk).

We could delay the experiment until the promised safety studies are completed and per reviewed, and this might prevent a catastrophy. (But then some scientists may not be the first to discover new science and some Nobel prizes may be lost.)

JTankers
LHCConcerns.com