<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is &#8220;God Particle&#8221; the right term for massive mystery in physics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: james evans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-17919</link>
		<dc:creator>james evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-17919</guid>
		<description>the name isnt very offensive to me because i do balieve in god and i believe in science i think god and science are the same thing so to say that isnt a god particle to me is like saying that god doesnt exist since in oone of the many verses of the bible it says thif yuo cut open a tree you will find me so in that sence god is all things so by saying that he must also be within the god particle as well. i go to church and they say god passes the ultimate power so that power to me must mean that he3 can creat something from nothing by using nothing to creat something for if you think about it nothing must be something or we wouldnt give it meaning so in this calling it the god particle wouldnt be offensive because gods child stated that he is everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the name isnt very offensive to me because i do balieve in god and i believe in science i think god and science are the same thing so to say that isnt a god particle to me is like saying that god doesnt exist since in oone of the many verses of the bible it says thif yuo cut open a tree you will find me so in that sence god is all things so by saying that he must also be within the god particle as well. i go to church and they say god passes the ultimate power so that power to me must mean that he3 can creat something from nothing by using nothing to creat something for if you think about it nothing must be something or we wouldnt give it meaning so in this calling it the god particle wouldnt be offensive because gods child stated that he is everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-13317</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-13317</guid>
		<description>A general law of probability states that the probability of a given evnet being due to chance is inversely proportional to the number of variables involved and the range of possible values for each of those variables.

It is reasonable to hypothesize that the Higgs boson was the initial result of the big bang.  If these most elementary particles almost immediately transoformed into the subatomic particles that gave rise to atoms, the probability is very low that these subatomic particles formed by chance because of the virtually infinite range of possible particle types that could have been produced.  Additionally, if the big bang was the initial event or cause of the physical universe and prior to that event there was nothing, a question arises of what was the first cause that resulted in something, even the Higgs boson, being produced from nothing?  An increasing number of scientists are coming to the conclusion that the big bang was intentional and the resulting universe was intelligently designed.  If these contentions are true, then an intelligent, living being did so.  Such a being would be supreme and is normally referred to as "God."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A general law of probability states that the probability of a given evnet being due to chance is inversely proportional to the number of variables involved and the range of possible values for each of those variables.</p>
<p>It is reasonable to hypothesize that the Higgs boson was the initial result of the big bang.  If these most elementary particles almost immediately transoformed into the subatomic particles that gave rise to atoms, the probability is very low that these subatomic particles formed by chance because of the virtually infinite range of possible particle types that could have been produced.  Additionally, if the big bang was the initial event or cause of the physical universe and prior to that event there was nothing, a question arises of what was the first cause that resulted in something, even the Higgs boson, being produced from nothing?  An increasing number of scientists are coming to the conclusion that the big bang was intentional and the resulting universe was intelligently designed.  If these contentions are true, then an intelligent, living being did so.  Such a being would be supreme and is normally referred to as &#8220;God.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Large Hadron Collider, Tiny Black Holes, &#38; The Higgs Boson, oh my! &#187; 27 Keith - 729, 243, 81, 27, 9, 3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-12334</link>
		<dc:creator>The Large Hadron Collider, Tiny Black Holes, &#38; The Higgs Boson, oh my! &#187; 27 Keith - 729, 243, 81, 27, 9, 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-12334</guid>
		<description>[...] Finding the Higgs particle will help solve and complete the General Unified Theory, now called Unified Field Theory, and also known as the Theory of Everything.  Because of this it has been referred to as the &#8216;God Particle&#8217;.  I personally do not believe that discoverying the &#8217;secrets&#8217; or interworkigns of the universe somehow either proves or disproves the existance of God.  However there is apparently much hype on this topic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Finding the Higgs particle will help solve and complete the General Unified Theory, now called Unified Field Theory, and also known as the Theory of Everything.  Because of this it has been referred to as the &#8216;God Particle&#8217;.  I personally do not believe that discoverying the &#8217;secrets&#8217; or interworkigns of the universe somehow either proves or disproves the existance of God.  However there is apparently much hype on this topic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patryk Ploszaj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-11553</link>
		<dc:creator>Patryk Ploszaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-11553</guid>
		<description>Not offensive at all - they're only words.  There's nothing wrong with trying to understand the nature of our existence, coming up with names, labels and classifications in the process.  It also seems natural (to some) that God is in the center of it all anyway - in whatever state, shape or form.  Plus, God doesn't mind... it's people who get offended for whatever reasons, not God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not offensive at all - they&#8217;re only words.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with trying to understand the nature of our existence, coming up with names, labels and classifications in the process.  It also seems natural (to some) that God is in the center of it all anyway - in whatever state, shape or form.  Plus, God doesn&#8217;t mind&#8230; it&#8217;s people who get offended for whatever reasons, not God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Material Science Fairy Tale! &#124; An Outsider's Perspective</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-10897</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Material Science Fairy Tale! &#124; An Outsider's Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-10897</guid>
		<description>[...] via FaithWorld » Blog Archive » Is “God Particle” the right term for massive mystery in physics? &#124;.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via FaithWorld » Blog Archive » Is “God Particle” the right term for massive mystery in physics? |&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voice inda widdernus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-9718</link>
		<dc:creator>voice inda widdernus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-9718</guid>
		<description>The reason the God particle is so elusive? God will not allow you to know what he knows. You are wasting your money. You are like Eve, wanting to be as wise as God. But God is just silly superstition to those who try to find him through science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the God particle is so elusive? God will not allow you to know what he knows. You are wasting your money. You are like Eve, wanting to be as wise as God. But God is just silly superstition to those who try to find him through science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojobee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-9109</link>
		<dc:creator>jojobee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-9109</guid>
		<description>The bible says "in the beginning was the word". Therefor to inquire into the nature of the universe as these physicists are doing is to follow God's will to understand his greatest book - the universe itself, which is the direct writing of God - the bible was "inspired" by God, the universe was created by God through his creative word. Physicists are the true holy men seeking to read the truest bible - the universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bible says &#8220;in the beginning was the word&#8221;. Therefor to inquire into the nature of the universe as these physicists are doing is to follow God&#8217;s will to understand his greatest book - the universe itself, which is the direct writing of God - the bible was &#8220;inspired&#8221; by God, the universe was created by God through his creative word. Physicists are the true holy men seeking to read the truest bible - the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caveman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-8641</link>
		<dc:creator>caveman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-8641</guid>
		<description>Yes, the "HIGGS BOSON" is refered to as the god particle. We should not seek the Scientific side of life.
We are no longer the leaders inthe world in science, math, health care, or anything else! But we lead the way in the Military Industrial Complex. Why spend billions on the trueth we we can spend it on BOMBS to take lives from those who do not agree with our religious beliefs.
A M E N !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the &#8220;HIGGS BOSON&#8221; is refered to as the god particle. We should not seek the Scientific side of life.<br />
We are no longer the leaders inthe world in science, math, health care, or anything else! But we lead the way in the Military Industrial Complex. Why spend billions on the trueth we we can spend it on BOMBS to take lives from those who do not agree with our religious beliefs.<br />
A M E N !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Helper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Helper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>Updating my last comment, Everyone read Genesis 11:1-9 and then turn to Isaiah Chapter 47 and read 8-15. And then Isaiah 48&#38;49. There will be No peace for the Wicked. Physicists who chase this have no inter peace. And the world needs to pray for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updating my last comment, Everyone read Genesis 11:1-9 and then turn to Isaiah Chapter 47 and read 8-15. And then Isaiah 48&amp;49. There will be No peace for the Wicked. Physicists who chase this have no inter peace. And the world needs to pray for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Helper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-7887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Helper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2008/04/09/is-god-particle-the-right-term-for-massive-mystery-in-physics/#comment-7887</guid>
		<description>, These Physicists are about to understand finally, that there are two realms the Physical and the Angelical. Something had to start the bang. The God Partical which is the Divine natural cause. But the Divine will only allow them to know what he wants them to as in the scripture Genesis 11:1-9. Why do Physicists ponder on this like in Genesis? It is unclean spirts that are controlling the minds of the Physicists, but it is not there fault in perspective, they have been led astray by the unclean spirts to do this project. As crazy as this seems it is the cause and effect of the Divine nature</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>, These Physicists are about to understand finally, that there are two realms the Physical and the Angelical. Something had to start the bang. The God Partical which is the Divine natural cause. But the Divine will only allow them to know what he wants them to as in the scripture Genesis 11:1-9. Why do Physicists ponder on this like in Genesis? It is unclean spirts that are controlling the minds of the Physicists, but it is not there fault in perspective, they have been led astray by the unclean spirts to do this project. As crazy as this seems it is the cause and effect of the Divine nature</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
