Peering through funnels at interfaith problems

November 4, 2008

Imagine you’re asked to examine a problem through a funnel but not told which end to look through. Some people will look through the narrow end and get a wide-angle view of the problem. Others will look through the wide end and get a narrow focus on certain parts of it. Both will be looking at the same problem, but in different ways.

This image came to mind after I spoke to members of both delegations in advance of the Catholic-Muslim Forum that starts today in Vatican City. Both sides are looking at the same problem – how to really improve understanding and cooperation between Christians and Muslims – but from different points of view. This doesn’t have to deadlock the talks – I don’t think either side wants that. But it does complicate things…

A kind of news blackout has been imposed on the closed-door talks on Tuesday and Wednesday, with only the official spokesman for both sides – Cardinal Tauran and Ibrahim Kalin – supposed to make any statements. In the run-up to the talks, the Catholic side has been quite active. Tauran spoke to La Croix and Vatican Radio in French on Monday, his deputy Archbishop Pier Luigi Celata to Vatican Radio in Italian and the Egyptian Jesuit Samir Khalil Samir, an adviser to the Catholic delegation, wrote a comment on Asianews.it (here in English). Kalin spoke to Reuters in advance – see our news story here – but the other Muslim delegates told me they could not be quoted.

Things will change on Thursday, when the delegates have a short audience with Pope Benedict (to be broadcast by in-house television to the Vatican press room) and then hold a public discussion session at the Pontifical Gregorian University that afternoon.

(At left, Common Word delegates Ibrahim Kalin (l) and Sohail Nakhooda in Rome).

As for that funnel analogy, who’s looking through which end? The Common Word delegation seems to have grabbed the narrow end and peered through it, thus getting a broad view of the challenge of deeper Christian-Muslim understanding. The Vatican side seems to have focused on issues within the Common Word manifesto, looking with two eyes through the wide end to zero in on specific questions. This is a rough analogy and not meant to criticise either position, since both perspectives can enrich the other. The broad view can help both sides to make progress despite differences on specific points. The narrow view can help clarify details of certain points in the Common Word manifesto. Of course, this is only the first meeting of this Catholic-Muslim Forum, so they are only starting to discuss the issues.

Another intersting development fits into the funnel analogy. The Common Word approach has been to unite as many Muslim leaders and scholars as possible, in line with the Islamic concept of seeking consensus within the decentralised faith. The Catholic approach couldn’t be more different – centralised and hierarchical, with the highpoint of the Vatican meeting being the papal audience organised down to the last detail. The latest example of this came last week when Libyan theologian Aref Ali Nayed, one of the leading figures in the Common Word group, won support from more than 460 Islamic organisations around the world gathered at a general conference of the World Islamic Call Society in Tripoli. The conference’s final declaration said: “The Conference declares its support for the ‘A Common Word’ initiative, and expresses its appreciation for the positive responses to it. It further calls for working through that initiative in order to widen the scope of mutual understanding and cooperation between Muslim and Christian institutions.”

That means that the World Islamic Call Society, one of the largest international Muslim organisations, will link its dialogue with the Vatican – which goes back to 1976 – with the Common Word group’s efforts. That brings more coordination to the confused landscape of interfaith talks now going on. Those looking through the narrow end of the funnel will see a broad consensus building while those looking through the wide end will focus on specific points and ask how deep the agreement on them really is. But these are not “either/or” propositions, they’re “both/and.” Finding the balance is the challenge.

Tuesday’s talks will be about theological issues arising from the Common Word’s claim that both religions share the core teaching of love of God and neighbour. Roughly speaking, this is the Muslim approach and some Catholic experts mistrust it because of fundamental differences between the faiths. Wednesday’s meeting will focus on human dignity, a catchword for the religious freedom issues the Catholics want to talk about.

Both sides stress the need for these talks to produce some practical results that prove they’re worth all the effort being made. Once again, they show the two sides looking at the issues from somewhat different perspectives. Kalin told me the Common Word group would like to see a crisis management plan worked out so Catholic and Muslim representatives could confer at times of tension, for example during a controversy over the Danish Prophet Mohammad cartoons or the persecution of Christians in Iraq, and make joint statements that might help calm the situation, he said. At the Cambridge meeting last month, Rev. Christian Troll S.J., a member of the Vatican delegation this week, suggested that the Cambridge Iner-Faith Programme could form a Christian-Muslim working committee to evaluate complaints from Muslims and Christians about violations of religious freedom.

Let’s see what comes out on Thursday.

 

5 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Please dont’ use Roman Catholic and Christian in the same sentence. They aren’t equal. Why would anyone discuss anything with a group that vows to kill them in multiple verses of their “bible”, the Koran.

Posted by Fred Conwell | Report as abusive

Fred Conwell, I have no idea what you mean by this comment. Since when are Roman Catholics not Christians? And since when don’t Christians speak with Muslims? You’re wrong on both counts.

Posted by Tom Heneghan | Report as abusive

Both religions should be shut down for their crimes against humanity. Neither group should be taken seriously unless the discussion is how to protect ourselves from pedophiles, bombers, women haters, fag bashers…….oh the list is just too long for this venue.

Posted by ckh1213 | Report as abusive

The kind of comments articles like this tend to attract underscore how critical such dialogue is. Although perhaps what would be more important is simply helping educate a public that is woefully ignorant of what it is either Catholicism or Islam is about. To say that the Qur’an teaches Muslims to kill Christians is so ludicrous that it hardly requires response. But to say that we shouldn’t be in dialogue with people who represent one sixth of the world’s population isn’t just ignorant, it’s living with your head in the sand.

The point is we are already in dialogue in numerous ways. Simply to exist means that we are in dialogue. The only issue is whether it is going to be positive or negative. Thank God for the kind of people who are promoting the kinds of relations represented here.

John H, perhaps you should read the quran. It does in fact advocate killing Christians and Jews. To claim otherwise simply isn’t honest. The worship of the adversary, which is what islam really is, isn’t a faith or a religion like most people would think. It is the worldview of an evil paedophile who was demon possesed. He wanted to kill, rape and steal, for his own benefit. He conned others into helping him by offering them some of the take. Nothing but evil, plain and simple. I would suggest reading chapter 9. Folks who don’t understand this are at risk of becoming one of the adversary’s prisoners. LSG

Posted by LateSixtiesGuy | Report as abusive