FaithWorld

Lawsuit on alleged religious bias in U.S military widened

December 31, 2008

A lawsuit alleging religious bias, including mandatory participation in Christian prayers, against the U.S. Department of Defense was expanded  this week, the latest twist in a story that probably won’t go away in 2009.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation’s (MRFF) expanded lawsuit said the U.S. military was sanctioning Christian missionary activity with Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan — a highly sensitive issue in two predominantly Muslim countries where the United States is waging war.

We’ve blogged on this before  – in September the MRFF said a non-religious Kansas soldier is suing U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on the grounds that his constitutional rights were violated when he was forced to attend military events where “fundamentalist Christian prayers” were recited.

Specialist Dustin Chalker’s cause was the second such case up by the MRFF.

 In a statement this week the group said it was expanding its lawsuit “to include two additions regarding unsuccessful attempts by service members to resolve their complaints (about religious bias) through military channels.”

It further stated that it had added: “five new categories of examples showing the ‘pattern and practice”‘of constitutionally impermissible promotions of religion by the military.”

These included: “military-sanctioned missionary proselytizing of Iraqi and Afghan citizens, an official USAF sponsored evangelical motocross team ministry … and the unbridled Christian supremacy espoused in a U.S. Army suicide prevention program.” 

Prayer and military events often coincide in the United States: for example prayers are often said at homecoming ceremonies when soldiers return from overseas tours.

Some activist groups such as the MRFF say evangelical Christianity is being promoted in the U.S. military through peer pressure, calls to prayer and other means.

Critics say this violates the separation of Church and state and creates a potential diplomatic minefield with U.S. forces waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Department of Defense spokesperson Eileen Lainez said the department did not comment on pending lawsuits.

But the department says the following: “The Department of Defense does not endorse any one religion or religious organization, and provides free access of religion for all members of the military services … There are systems in place to provide a means to address and resolve any perceived unfair treatment on the basis of race, national origin, color, gender, and/or religious affiliation, or sexual harassment.”

 With President George W. Bush, conservative U.S. evangelicals have had a friend and ally in the White House for almost eight years. It will be interesting to see how the administration of president-elect Barack Obama handles these kinds of issues after he assumes office in January.

(Photo credit: U.S. soldiers pause for a short prayer during a Christmas ceremony in Baghdad’s Sadr City December 25, 2008. REUTERS/Erik de Castro  (IRAQ)P

Comments
One comment so far | RSS Comments RSS

Instead of judgeing a person by what or whom he worships maybe one should just say Hi to that person. Very often those who begin wars seldom actually take up arms in them and mostly hand out orders from some compfortable office or other. To only see a person as a christian or muslim is to limit that person and pigeon hole them and we all know that religion these days has become (if all else fails) a reason to have a war! Jesus didnt and wasnt a religion, man turned him into that and made a fortune in the process. It helps to call your enemy something it justifies what you are about to do to him. War is horrific enough without bringing religion into it and mans inhumanity to his fellow man sems to get hidden by the smokescreen we gift to justify murder, mutilation and death.

Posted by hopesome | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/