<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bishop Williamson says SSPX will never agree to &#8220;conciliarism&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/01/28/bishop-williamson-says-sspx-will-never-agree-to-conciliarism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/01/28/bishop-williamson-says-sspx-will-never-agree-to-conciliarism/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Heneghan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/01/28/bishop-williamson-says-sspx-will-never-agree-to-conciliarism/comment-page-1/#comment-10274</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Heneghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=3917#comment-10274</guid>
		<description>Laura, do you really think I&#039;ve &quot;tried to outlaw the right to an opinion&quot;? How can I try -- and how could I succeed -- to outlaw anything? That statement implies I can change a legal right that I have no power to change. You seem to say I insist that Catholics don&#039;t want unity among the faithful and the modern world can eliminate the need for intellectual honesty. When and where did I ever say that? You also ignore the fact that I&#039;ve posted critical comments from you and others (on other posts about the SSPX) all through this discussion. If you want to dispute something I&#039;ve actually written, you&#039;re very welcome to do so. But do it with the intellectual honesty you advocate. Don&#039;t just make up hollow charges because you don&#039;t agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura, do you really think I&#8217;ve &#8220;tried to outlaw the right to an opinion&#8221;? How can I try &#8212; and how could I succeed &#8212; to outlaw anything? That statement implies I can change a legal right that I have no power to change. You seem to say I insist that Catholics don&#8217;t want unity among the faithful and the modern world can eliminate the need for intellectual honesty. When and where did I ever say that? You also ignore the fact that I&#8217;ve posted critical comments from you and others (on other posts about the SSPX) all through this discussion. If you want to dispute something I&#8217;ve actually written, you&#8217;re very welcome to do so. But do it with the intellectual honesty you advocate. Don&#8217;t just make up hollow charges because you don&#8217;t agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/01/28/bishop-williamson-says-sspx-will-never-agree-to-conciliarism/comment-page-1/#comment-10270</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=3917#comment-10270</guid>
		<description>Millions of faithful Catholics would beg to differ with your interpretation of these events. While the media twist and spin all words and motives to promote their view if all things, truth will out. Your insistence not withstanding, Catholics want unity among the faithful and the modern world cannot eliminate the need for intellectual honesty. You have tried to outlaw the right to an opinion and even if you succeed, opinion and facts you don&#039;t agree with will still remain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millions of faithful Catholics would beg to differ with your interpretation of these events. While the media twist and spin all words and motives to promote their view if all things, truth will out. Your insistence not withstanding, Catholics want unity among the faithful and the modern world cannot eliminate the need for intellectual honesty. You have tried to outlaw the right to an opinion and even if you succeed, opinion and facts you don&#8217;t agree with will still remain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/01/28/bishop-williamson-says-sspx-will-never-agree-to-conciliarism/comment-page-1/#comment-10034</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=3917#comment-10034</guid>
		<description>Real Bible Truths From Genuine Christians
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGxnfU7GfLc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Bible Truths From Genuine Christians<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGxnfU7GfLc'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGxnfU7Gf Lc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Fuchs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/01/28/bishop-williamson-says-sspx-will-never-agree-to-conciliarism/comment-page-1/#comment-9985</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Fuchs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=3917#comment-9985</guid>
		<description>I kinda think that Teilhard de Chardin might be Bishop Williamson&#039;s favorite theologian. My bad, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda think that Teilhard de Chardin might be Bishop Williamson&#8217;s favorite theologian. My bad, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
