Comments on: U.S. High Court lets city block religious monument http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/02/25/us-high-court-lets-city-block-religious-monument/ Religion, faith and ethics Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:25:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Tom Heneghan http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/02/25/us-high-court-lets-city-block-religious-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-10831 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:02:19 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=4452#comment-10831 The text is available on the Supreme Court’s website.

]]>
By: Daniel Rosaupan http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/02/25/us-high-court-lets-city-block-religious-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-10826 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:52:45 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=4452#comment-10826 I think reuters should have given us the full text of the decision so that we can evaluate the reasonings enunciated by the US Supreme Court or at least gave us the website where the decision was posted. Because I don’t think the only issue affected here was freedom of expression but also the equal protection clause and the principle of balancing of interest.

]]>