<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What was real reason for banning Tariq Ramadan from U.S.?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/03/19/what-was-real-reason-for-banning-tariq-ramadan-from-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/03/19/what-was-real-reason-for-banning-tariq-ramadan-from-us/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/03/19/what-was-real-reason-for-banning-tariq-ramadan-from-us/comment-page-1/#comment-11970</link>
		<dc:creator>SM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=4853#comment-11970</guid>
		<description>Do you have any follow-up articles on the ACLU&#039;s lawsuit challenging Professor Ramadan’s exclusion? Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any follow-up articles on the ACLU&#8217;s lawsuit challenging Professor Ramadan’s exclusion? Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/03/19/what-was-real-reason-for-banning-tariq-ramadan-from-us/comment-page-1/#comment-11244</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=4853#comment-11244</guid>
		<description>WHO - just exactly WHO says this person is welcomed in Britain. You can be sure it is not by any true native Brit! I believe there is no real long term way to accommodate some of the views held dear by a certain faction of Muslims, so maybe until they learn to respect the predominant culture of the country where they live, may I also respectfully invite them to remain in a country where such values held important by them are upheld and that is certainly not within the UK. Thank you nicely.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHO &#8211; just exactly WHO says this person is welcomed in Britain. You can be sure it is not by any true native Brit! I believe there is no real long term way to accommodate some of the views held dear by a certain faction of Muslims, so maybe until they learn to respect the predominant culture of the country where they live, may I also respectfully invite them to remain in a country where such values held important by them are upheld and that is certainly not within the UK. Thank you nicely&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/03/19/what-was-real-reason-for-banning-tariq-ramadan-from-us/comment-page-1/#comment-11226</link>
		<dc:creator>jd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=4853#comment-11226</guid>
		<description>one cannot wage a war on terror whilst feting a terror supporter - so would go the official us line and, if their reasoning is correct, then so is their judgement.  mere transparency regarding the decision would go a long way to quelling doubts and, if the judgement was wrong, protecting freedom without promoting irresponsibility</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one cannot wage a war on terror whilst feting a terror supporter &#8211; so would go the official us line and, if their reasoning is correct, then so is their judgement.  mere transparency regarding the decision would go a long way to quelling doubts and, if the judgement was wrong, protecting freedom without promoting irresponsibility</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
