Religion and politics in “bewilderingly diverse” India

April 27, 2009

asghar-ali-engineer“Bewildingerly diverse” is the way Asghar Ali Engineer describes his native country, India. This 70-year-old Muslim scholar has written dozens of books about Indian politics and society, Islamic reform and interreligious dialogue. As head of the Centre for the Study of Society and Secularism in Mumbai, he works to promote peace and understanding among religious and ethnic communities through seminars, workshops, youth camps, research and publications. The centre even organises street plays in the slums of Mumbai to teach the poor about the dangers of communalism.

Our long conversation at the Centre in Mumbai’s Santa Cruz neighbourhood of Mumbai during a recent visit to India provided a few key quotes for my earlier analysis and blog post on religion in the Indian election campaign. Since these issues are crucial to the general election taking place in India, I’ve transcribed longer excerpts from his answers and posted them on the second page of this post.

(Photo: Asghar Ali Engineer, 14 April 2009/Tom Heneghan)

What is the role of communalism in Indian elections?

“The BJP bases its whole politics around accusations that Congress uses Muslims as vote banks and does a lot of favours for them. ‘The Muslims vote for Congress and we are against vote bank politics,’ that’s what they claim. But the BJP itself is basing its politics on Hindu vote banks, (especially) certain castes among Hindus, particularly the upper castes. But when they saw that upper class support cannot put them into power in Delhi, they widened their circle and tried to include some OBC (Other Backward Class) Hindus. Many OBC leaders have become militant Hindu leaders. They are more militant than the upper-class leaders. They see this as the only way to carve out their niche in upper-class politics. Dalits are lower than the OBC. Dalits generally vote for secular parties. Most used to vote for Congress, but now many caste parties have come into existence — for example, (the Dalit politician) Mayawati. She’s also widening her political base by including the upper class.

mayawati So are the politicians mostly to blame for using “wedge issues” between religious and ethnic communities to mobilise their voters?

(Photo: Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati, 9 August 2008/Pawan Kumar)

“Left to themselves, there would be no tension (between communities). But politicians have to face so many elections — municipal, panchayat, state assembly, parliament – and during all these elections, identity has become important. Since the late 1980s, the Indian population has been polarised like never before. During all those years Congress was ruling, it was a sort of umbrella organisation trying to carry certain castes and communities with it. But not all castes and communities were getting justice, so other parties came into existence. You see it’s 60 years of our democracy and each election brings more and more political awareness among the people … All politicians make promises to Christians, to Dalits, etc. When the promises are not fulfilled, then some regional parties come into existence.”

Why is communalism so persistent in a secular democracy like India?

“Our educational system injects communalism into the minds of young children. They grow up with those ideas, with hatred of Muslims. Nehru very much desired change in the education system but he never succeeded because it is a state subject, not a national subject, so they could do little to change it. The RSS, which is a major Hindu communal force, kept on training people in communal ideas and putting them in various cadres like teachers, police, army, bureaucrats, journalists … We are a secular democratic country, fine, but in practice, communal ideas and violence have gone very deep into our system. India being such a diverse country, identity becomes more and more important. This is not like a European country. Now in the post-colonial period, multiculturalism became important (in Europe). But those nations were formed long ago. India has deep trouble forming a nation itself. Nation-building is much more challenging, all these identities come into play …

Here in India, migration is causing problems. Shiv Sena has its ‘sons of the soil’ theory and says all jobs should go to Maharastrians. ‘Why are they settling here? Why are the coming to Mumbai?’ they ask. So people were attacked. Interstate migration in India is like international migration in Europe. And India is so backward. There are so little resources to be shared among so many people.”

varunVarun Gandhi, an estranged member of the Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty who is campaigning for the BJP, played the religion card with a speech that reportedly threatened to chop of the hands of any Muslims harming Hindus. This seems to have embarrassed the BJP. Why is he a problem for them?

(Photo: Varun Gandhi arrives at court for hearing on charges of hate speech, 28 March 2009/Adnan Abidi)

“The BJP leadership has to exercise caution. If they’re seen as extremists, they will not be voted into power. But this young boy had no experience and thought he’d become a hero for the Hindu community with these strong words. Even the BJP had to distance itself, but then said he would be their candidate.”

India’s Muslim population, one of the largest in the world, is generally moderate in its politics. How do you explain this?

Any majority tends to be more aggressive and assertive. As we see, Hindus are more assertive here and Muslims are more assertive in Pakistan. Right-wing Christians in America are more assertive. Muslims are in a minority here, a 15 percent minority. A minority cannot afford to be aggressive. Secondly, there is the impact of Indian culture. It is basically a composite culture. In any multi-religious society, you will find that the different religious traditions create a new tradition that is more moderate and less aggressive. The third important factor is Sufi Islam. In India, the overwhelming majority of Muslims believe in Sufi Islam, which is basically a peaceful Islam. Several things make Pakistani Islam more aggressive. First, it is in the majority. Secondly, Punjabi Muslims want to maintain their hegemony over other Muslims in Pakistan — Sindhis, Baluch, Pathans — so they tend to be more aggressive also in their Islam, in order to maintain their hegemony. Thirdly, the army is mostly Punjabi and it is using Islam with a vengeance to maintain its hegemony in Pakistan and to supplant democratic forces. And now the Taliban are another factor …”

jama-delhiWhat about the Deobandis, the traditionalist school of Islam that inspired the Taliban? It originated in India and runs the influential Darul Uloom Deoband seminary north of Delhi.

(Picture: Jama Masjid in Delhi, 9 Dec 2008/Vijay Mathur)

“Indian Deobandis and Pakistani Deobandis are quite different. Islam is in the majority over there. The ulema have been politicised, they want and they use Islam. There is a very interesting phenomenon here. The Deobandis here are attacking terrorism and militancy. Deobandis have held largest demonstrations in India against terrorism … They are puritan otherwise and against Sufism, but in the Indian environment, their behaviour is very different.”

So do most Indian Muslims think secularism is best?

Yes, here the Deobandis and the Jamaat-i-Islami, which is totally against secularism in Pakistan, support secularism in India. In fact, these days (the Indian) Jamaat-i-Islami is in the forefront of the secular democratic movement. In the early days of independence, Jamaat-i-Islami opposed secularism in India and refused to take part in elections. But after the demolition of the Babri Masjid and the riots in Mumbai, they totally changed their policy and formed a secular democratic front that’s spreading secular values today. The Jamaat in Pakistan is like the RSS and BJP here. But here its character is entirely liberal.

The situation makes you respond. That’s what I argue. Religion was instituted in certain circumstances and believers respond accordingly. If extremism pays, they will resort to extremism. If moderation pays, they will respond to moderation. Religion by itself is neither extremist nor moderate. It is human followers who become extremist or moderate according to their situation. It’s a tool — an instrumental cause, not a fundamental cause. Those who maintain that terrorism originates in Islam have to think, why is there this difference?”

INDIA TEMPLETell me about your centre’s work in Interfaith dialogue and conflict resolution.

Politicians basically exploit misunderstandings, so we base our dialogue on issues. Take, for example, the issue of violence and religion – what is violence in the Hindu, Muslim and Christian traditions? What is the position of women in religions? Those issues create problems and misunderstanding. Unfortunately, those who condemn religion and hold it responsible for what happens in society neither know their own religion nor the others. But when we explain things to them, they start to understand …

(Photo: Hindu militant in Kolkata, 26 Sept 2002/Jayanta Shaw)

I conduct a lot of workshops for the police. They have such prejudices against Muslims, all based on ignorance. But they have seen things from one side only. When we hold workshops, prejudices are dispelled. We have more and more requests for these workshops in Maharashtra, Haryana, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh. I’ve been holding these workshops continuously, sometimes invited to conduct workshops for the recruits, 3,000 – 4,000 in number.

“We have identified four groups which are crucial to promoting peace. Teachers, because education is very crucial. Second is police, of course, because they maintain law and order. If they rise above prejudices, they can control better. The prejudices are simply atrocious in communal politics, simply atrocious. There are such raw prejudices against Muslims. Third category is youth. Fourth is journalists. What they write in newspapers … Just now our workshop is going on about peace and conflict resolution in Ayodha, which is the centre of this whole controversy. We hold workshops in all these sensitive areas.”

6 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Why do we always have to mix religion with politics ? True, its a fact but then the media can be a little more sensitive and sensible. Can we not talk about the development instead ?? Which government has contributed the most to nation’s development ? Which state govt. has performed the best ?? I think that should be the criteria of political analysis. That is what should drive the voter to the polling booth and the candidate…not his / his candidate’s caste and religion. These politicians play around with our emotions and we become their puppets. That’s not what democracy means… Democracy, as it is known, means Rule of the People, By the People and For the People …. WHERE ARE WE THE PEOPLE ????

Posted by Abhijaat | Report as abusive

[...] Want Secularism? Put your money where your mouth is Jump to Comments   Religion and politics in “bewilderingly diverse” India [...]

Is the author as secular as he is pretending to be? Looks like a total anti-hindu fanatic to me. If you are as secular as you are pretending to be by publishing this article, can I see another publication of what some hindu scholar thinks of congress’s muslim vote bank politics? But if you cant write that, then stop this pretense of responsible journalism.

Posted by kusum | Report as abusive

All the way Mr Ali Asghar seems to be backing for Indian muslims and saying himself seculer and what a stupid comparison of Jammat in Pakistan to BJP and RSS in India. I am not against of Indian muslims and I don’t think BJP or SS or RSS are against them. India had composite culture, but things has changed after 1947 so if someone is making use of minority as sheild what the heck wronge BJP did?? The only thing they are supporting Hindu and Hinduism what’s wronge in supporting Shri Ram or Hinduism..?? When American president takes oath for presidential term he refers to Holy Bible and Christian values is that not fundamentalism Mr Ali Asghar..?? and if BJP or ShivSena or RSS backs Hinduism a scholer like you comparing them to Jamaat.. what a pity..?? No address is complete without referring to religion. I think you might have got heavily paid by some congressman to make such foolish statements.. hats off..

Posted by shardul | Report as abusive

Idiot! The author can’t see what is the plight of muslims during more than 50 years of congress rule in India and yet they blame it on the “6 years” of BJP rule in India. Because of hypocrites like you the scums of congress are destroying India with their minority appeasement policies. Just to appease Muslims the congress took off POTA & immediately you see the results in fighting terror, never seen a more failed government (blame that italian for all these, she and her “secular” image), and afzal guru is just hoping for “mera number kab aayega???”…Absolute nonsense treating a terrorist like any other criminal is just another example what this congress is all about and when BJP questions about afzal, they say they want to hang him because he is muslim and BJP is communal. “Minorities” in India are pulling the country back with their mentality of supporting the “secular” congress and going against “communal” BJP. If you see the history of India, you will really find out who is communal and who is secular! This nonsense author will never go beyond the blogs!!!! IDIOT!

Posted by shashank | Report as abusive

Brillient! to start with … the problem is not a religious one here but a behaviorial one … this is very well understood here by Dr. Engineer.

As for the uncoth comments on this blog … it seems that either some of the respondents are totally brain washed into believing what they believe or they have poor english-language skills to understand the full essence of what Dr. Engineer said.

The very supposition that Sangh Parivar is not biased against the minority communities is a joke. The bottemline of the Hindu-right wing belief is “… that our culture, thinking and psychology should prevail (not co-exist) over that of the minorities with an end aim of replacing them subequently and eventually …”

What is required really is a truely broad-minded approach … because mind you … the minorities are numerous enough, though minorities, in India that Hindu right wing will end up doing nothing but harming the larger Indian interest.

Posted by Farhan | Report as abusive

extremism has a no place in any religion, Although it is Fundamentalism which is scope-full and and yield good results. whether RSS, BJP Or Jamat, unless and until they shun the clothing of Extremism, peace has no guarantee in ether of the countries….

Posted by Mirzaahrar | Report as abusive