Pope Benedict slowly learns how to dialogue with Muslims

May 14, 2009


(Photo: Pope Benedict with Muslim leaders in Jerusalem’s Dome of the Rock, 12 May 2009/Osservatore Romano)

“Branded an implacable foe of Islam after his landmark Regensburg speech in 2006, Pope Benedict has shown during his current Holy Land tour that he is slowly learning how to dialogue with Muslims.

“While media attention has focussed on Jewish criticism of his speech at the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, Benedict’s speeches to Muslims have used classic Islamic terms and new arguments that resonate with Muslims and ease the quest for common ground.

“This new tone may not erase the memory of the Regensburg speech many Muslims took as an insult, because it implied Islam was violent and irrational. But Islamic, Jewish and Catholic clerics told Reuters it marked a shift in his thinking that could help the world’s two largest faiths get along better…”

My analysis for the Reuters wire (read the whole article here) will sound familiar to readers of the blog because I already flagged the ideas here in the posts At Dome of Rock, Benedict uses Muslims’ argument to Muslims and Benedict’s “anti-Regensburg” speech in Amman mosque. But turning these reporters’ observations into an analysis for Reuters requires more than just my observations. So I spent a few hours yesterday calling interfaith dialogue experts to hear their reactions to Benedict’s speeches.

There were a few interesting observations I couldn’t squeeze into the wire story because of the strict length limitations we have there. For example, Fr. Roucou felt that Benedict’s speech at the Dome of the Rock was “a bit too philosophical” because it didn’t have anything specifically Christian in it. “It’s too bad in the speeches to the Muslims that there were no references to Jesus and the Gospels,” he said. “It’s all about the Creator God. That’s fine — I don’t want to get the Gospels in there at any price. But in his speeches to Jews, Benedict quoted the Psalms.”

Noting the way Benedict seemed to be connecting with Muslims but having a harder time with Jews, especially Israeli public opinion, Imam Hendi said: “The fact that the Holy See can talk to Muslims doesn’t mean it can’t talk to Jews. I want Jews and Muslims and Christians around the table for dialogue. It can never be complete if Jews aren’t part of the dialogue.” The way that Benedict built upon the Common Word appeal for dialogue “creates a wonderful momentum. I believe he’s doing the right thing and I believe we can move forward”.

Given the seven-hour time difference between Jerusalem and New York, I first emailed Rabbi Visotzky to ask when was the best time to call. In addition to setting a time for our talk, he also sent along an interesting observation about how important it is in interfaith dialogue to use terms the others know or define terms so they can understand them: “One must learn the language of “the Other” in order to enter dialogue. It helps in a variety of ways, not the least of which is to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings. To wit, when I was meeting with a group of Saudi Imams, the U.S. State Dept. translator gently explained to me that although I knew what I meant when I used the term Zionist (and it was a positive thing), they heard it as a very negative term. Once I defined it to them, we were able to move on…”


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

I do not understand why it is always the Catholic Church that reaches its hands to its detractors? When other religions makes offensive remarks against the Church, or should I say, harms in whatever manner the Church, no one bothers. They don’t even apologize. But when Rome speaks, the whole world listens! And from there, they will make destructive and hostile criticisms, as if they had not comitted any sins. Indeed, its a sign that the Catholic Church is founded by Christ suffering the same fate with his Lord.

Posted by Daniel Rosaupan | Report as abusive

same courtesy should be extended to hindus. The hindus are very tolerant and accepting. Other religions should emulate this tenet.

Then, religious peace will be universal, violence evaporates. Muslims should turn secular and should cease spreading hatred.

Posted by Azad | Report as abusive

The Pop’s visit is an important step to build relations with the Muslim world, And it should not bet mistaken that it is every thing the Pop must do. However a welcome first step.

The Muslim world has many things to do too, we should explain ourselves more to the west. And the west has to understand that there others with different ideologies, and standards.

Posted by Saqr | Report as abusive

[…] of hope that our media also convey with their pictures. As one reporter put it hopefully, “Pope slowly learns to dialogue with Muslims.” « Was 1948 a Jihad? Gelber reviews Morris […]

Posted by Augean Stables » Studies in Demopathy and Pope’s Visit III: It goes so deep and we’re so clueless, they don’t even try | Report as abusive

[…] crestini pentru a adresa un raspuns la initiative musulmana. in May 2009, Papa Benedict a confirmat efortul crestin in directi aunui dialog costructiv cu religia musulamana.Probabil ca initiatorii dialogului […]

Posted by pe scara Cerului » Blog Archive » si premiul merge la… | Report as abusive