Comments on: Unusual tit-for-tat in the Vatican over Williamson affair http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/ Religion, faith and ethics Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:25:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Robert http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-19571 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:29:09 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-19571 Several Catholic Mystics who have been approved by the Church in the past have related that a “New Mass” will be imposed on the Church that is both “Odious” in Gods sight (Marie-Julie Jahenny – 1902) and “Impious” Blessed Anna Catherine Emmerick – 1800’s, just to name a few. Recently a Jesuit German Seminary Professor, friend of JPII and HHPBVI, said that in 2000 he questioned then Cardinal Ratzinger about the supposed missing part of the 3rd secret of Fatima. He related that Cardinal Ratzinger said that Our Lady specifically warned in the 3rd secret that the Church was not to touch or change the Mass or the Sacraments and that that warning givin what today’s situation is the Church will not make public. So, it would seem from the above, which is no where exhastive on this subject, indicates that we are heading towards God’s punishment for going against Heaven and God’s will. Did not Our Lord say to Lucy in 1930’s in Spain that until Russia is consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary (not the world but Russia by name – which has not been done yet) by all the Bishops of the world at the same time – that the Church and the world will fall into ruin – notwithstanding the indefectibility of the Church whereby God will intervene when all seems lost.

]]>
By: Robert http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-19570 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:37 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-19570 Modern scientific, historical and social inquiry indicate that Bishop Williamson’s comments on the Holocaust are justified, honest and are in accord with current professional inquiry. To make inquiry and scientific investigation unlawful as regards the “story” of the Holocaust surely indicates that it is just that “a story” or maybe the biggest fraud ever put forward on the world stage. My mother spent two years in the concentration camps, Buchenwald, the labour camps and Nuremburg and said that the gas chambers never existed until made up after the war. The International Red Cross was allowed full 100% access to all camps and prisoners during the war and recorded all deaths which totalled no more that 300,000 for all causes including Typhoid which was the biggest killer. The allies bombed anything that moved during the last two years of the war and prevented any supplies and food from reaching the camps resulting in disease and starvation. Less than three million Jews were in German occupied territory and nearly two million claim to be “survivors”. Do the math. One year after the war the Jewish population world wide had risen to 15 million from less than 10 million before the war. ?????????? Let a neutral scientific, historical investigation put things to rest or rather expose the fraud.

]]>
By: Tom Heneghan http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-17684 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:55:12 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-17684 Jack E. Boucher, thanks for sending in this comment — and thanks especially for signing it with your own name! Most readers sending in comments use pseudonyms and some hide behind this camouflage to write crude, unreasonable or even irrelevant comments they apparently wouldn’t want to own up to by signing them openly. As someone who writes under his own name and exposes himself regularly to criticism and abuse from readers, you can imagine I don’t have a high opinion of those who take pot shots from behind pseudonyms. But we have to allow pseudonyms, that’s the custom on the web. That said, we don’t have to let people misuse that concession to make this into their personal soap box where they can rant and rave. We also have to monitor and sometimes delete comments because they could contain libelous statements that we would be responsible for, even though they were made by anonymous readers. So that’s the reason for this policy, not — despite what some people may think — any desire to censor what we don’t agree with. If you think we have an agenda and want to censor comments, just look through some of the comments that have been posted on this and other blog posts in recent days. You get all shades of opinion.

]]>
By: Jack E. Boucher http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-17674 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:23:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-17674 Two situations have me totally fed up! First and foremost, we have the opoportunity to voice our comments in this script. yet you say they may not be published! Why not??? Folks should be willing to be quoted, and not guarded. Second. Bishop Williamson shoud be defrocked by the Pope or whoever. But first he needs to be sent to the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC and forced to view every exhibit. Or maybe it would be better [if that is posible} to jusrt ignore the rantings and ravings of one who has lost his senses, if he every had them! When will the Catholic Church regain it’s sanity AND guts.I agree with the Wall Street Journal’s article relating to the need for the Church to have a general house cleaning of the heirarchy and a return to the days {if they ever existed} when reverence, prayer, and worship were the venues of the day. Not grandstanding and violating the canons of the Church. Have these clerics lost their faith? Do they not understand why they were ordained? These are my comments, and I stand with them!

]]>
By: Lember http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-16928 Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:24:38 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-16928 Ahmadinejad is utterly correct when he said that the jewish holocaust is mostly a lie.Why don’t they take him up on the challenge of an International Study of the jewish holocaust?

]]>
By: Paul http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-16913 Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:28:32 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-16913 That interview was in the year 2006 , it was used as an anti – traditional stroke , because cardinals Castrillon & Casper are anti – traditionalists . I have a question for cardinal Castrilion Hoyos : What kind of catholic goes to any given government and ask them to remove Christ as the king of their country ? It does not make sense, is Christ not your king ? Is He not your Redeemer ?

]]>
By: George Patsourakos http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-16906 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:20:18 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-16906 I believe that Bishop Williamson apologized for denying the extent of the Holocaust.If he did apologize, let’s end this discussion; if he did not, then disciplinary action needs to be taken against Bishop Williamson.

]]>
By: Robert http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-16905 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:03:45 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-16905 Why is such a horrible thing to question the jewish holocaust during WWII and not the Armenian holocaust during WWI, Mao Tse Tung holocaust against the chinese,Pol Pot holocaust agains the cambodian after Vietnam war,all the Stalin holocausts against entire ethnic population.etc., etc.

]]>
By: Ted http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/09/25/unusual-tit-for-tat-in-the-vatican-over-williamson-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-16898 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:39:41 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=8479#comment-16898 It is unimaginable for any Churchman to cooperate with this sleazy Swedish TV program.Cardinal Hoyos is very diplomatic and making accusations is unlike him. To see him accuse someone of slander says to me that he has good reason to say such a thing.In any event, they’re making a mountain out of a molehill. This numbers game is a sideshow and has no bearing on one’s status in the Church unless you are actually someone motivated by racial hatred and false pagan racist ideologies like Nazism.

]]>