<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thundering sermons produce surprising results in Germany&#8217;s Afghanistan debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/01/11/thundering-sermons-produce-surprising-results-in-germanys-afghanistan-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/01/11/thundering-sermons-produce-surprising-results-in-germanys-afghanistan-debate/</link>
	<description>Religion, faith and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon86</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/01/11/thundering-sermons-produce-surprising-results-in-germanys-afghanistan-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23328</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=10984#comment-23328</guid>
		<description>If preventing an enemy nation from annexing Kuwait is not a just war, and overthrowing a repressive theocracy is not a just war, then there are no just wars.

Does that mean we should never have wars? Of course not.

It just means that there is no longer any reason to justify those wars to those opposed to them.  

Because we know they will accept any injustice, any oppression, as long as war is avoided. With a moral position like that, who cares what they think about the justice of war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If preventing an enemy nation from annexing Kuwait is not a just war, and overthrowing a repressive theocracy is not a just war, then there are no just wars.</p>
<p>Does that mean we should never have wars? Of course not.</p>
<p>It just means that there is no longer any reason to justify those wars to those opposed to them.  </p>
<p>Because we know they will accept any injustice, any oppression, as long as war is avoided. With a moral position like that, who cares what they think about the justice of war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spiritedcrone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/01/11/thundering-sermons-produce-surprising-results-in-germanys-afghanistan-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23322</link>
		<dc:creator>spiritedcrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/?p=10984#comment-23322</guid>
		<description>Bravo Bishop Kassmann.  The Jesus tradition is all about challenging unjust structures and finding a way to bring about a more inclusive and peaceful society.  It is an authentic role for church leaders to challenge governments around issues of peace and justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Bishop Kassmann.  The Jesus tradition is all about challenging unjust structures and finding a way to bring about a more inclusive and peaceful society.  It is an authentic role for church leaders to challenge governments around issues of peace and justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
